Laserfiche WebLink
<br />i <br /> <br />constraints of this study, it was not possible to study all of the Upper Colorado River sub-basins. Yet by <br /> <br />studying smaller, detailed sub-basin models, only limited information on the entire basin could be gel'lerated. <br /> <br />Thus, we used the composite Two-elevation model to obtain an overview of the impacts on the entire upper <br /> <br />basin. The Two-elevation model has an additional advantage of being highly correlated with streamflow <br /> <br />nodes in the CRSS water-supply model. <br /> <br />All three sub-basins are high-elevation, snowmelt-driven watersheds, with no significant rainfall <br /> <br />showing up in the average hydrograph. Streamflow measurements for the White River model come from <br /> <br />the USGS gauging station located 2.5 miles east of Meeker at an elevation of 6300 feet. The drainage area <br /> <br />of the White River covers approximately 770 square miles. The period of record for the White River dates <br /> <br />from 1909. Mean annual discharge computed over the period 1949-1983 is about 435 thousand acre-feet <br /> <br />(tat). East River measurements are made at the Almont station, which has an elevation of 8006 feet. The <br /> <br />period of record dates from October, 1934. Streamflow measurements for the Animas River are made at <br /> <br />an elevation of 6502 feet at the station of Durango. Records date from 1912. In all cases, monthly and <br /> <br /> <br />annual streamflow records are classified as "good".7 Streamflow into Lake Powell, which is used to calibrate <br /> <br />the Two-elevation model, is calculated by the Bureau of Reclamation based on reservoir outflow, changes <br /> <br />in reservoir storages, and evaporative losses, and is checked against the combined flows of three upstream <br /> <br />USGS gauging stations (the Colorado River at Cisco, the Green River at Green River [Utah], and the San <br /> <br />Juan River at Bluff). <br /> <br />As stated above, the NWSRFS is a forecasting model that was developed for the short-term <br /> <br />forecasting of streamflows. For this purpose snow-pack conditions, daily observations of temperature and <br /> <br />7 USGS classifications are defined as follows: <br />Excellent -- 95% of daily discharges are within 5% of their true value. <br />Good -- discharges are within 10% of their true value. <br />Fair -- discharges are within 15% of their true value. <br />Poor -- discharges do not fall within 15% of their true value. <br /> <br />13 <br />