My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7997
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:57 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 4:30:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7997
Author
Nash, L. L. and P. H. Gleick.
Title
The Colorado River Basin and Climatic Change, The Sensitivity of Streamflow and Water Supply to Variations in Temperature and Precipitation.
USFW Year
1993.
USFW - Doc Type
EPA 230-R-93-009,
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
129
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />occur on the scale of tens or hundreds of square kilometers -- a scale several orders of magnitude finer than <br /> <br />current GCM resolution.6 <br /> <br />Second, hydrologic parameterizations in GCMs are very simple and often do not provide the <br /> <br />detailed information necessary for water-resource planning (WMO, 1987). For example, the GCM soil- <br /> <br />moisture budget is typically computed by the so-called "bucket method", in which the field capacity of the <br /> <br />soil is assumed to be uniform everywhere (Manabe. 1969a,b). Runoff occurs when the soil moisture <br /> <br />exceeds this capacity, and the rate of evaporation is determined as a simple function of the soil moisture <br /> <br />and the potential evaporation rate (Manabe and Wetherald, 1985). Efforts are being made to improve GCM <br /> <br />hydrology (Dickinson, 1984; IPCC, 1990), including improvements in vegetation parameterizations and the <br /> <br />behavior of soils. Until such improvements occur, however, other methods must be used to evaluate <br /> <br />hydrologic impacts. <br /> <br />Temperature predictions are considered to be the most reliable GCM output relative to <br /> <br />precipitation, and other climatic variables (IPCC, 1990). More generally, GCM predictions of changes In <br /> <br />temperature, precipitation, and other climatological variables are considered much more reliable than <br /> <br />predictions of runoff or soil moisture (IPCC, 1990; WMO, 1987). Consequently, several investigators have <br /> <br />emphasized using temperature and precipitation estimates for a doubled-C~ environment as inputs to more <br /> <br />detailed regional models (e.g., USEPA, 1990; Lettenmaier and Gan, 1990; Bultot, et al., 1988; Gleick, <br /> <br />1987a,b). <br /> <br />Under the guidance of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, a set of climate-change <br /> <br />scenarios was developed for use in evaluating the impacts of the greenhouse effect on water availability in <br /> <br />6.y-his is not meant to imply that increasing GCM resolution alone will resolve the bulk of the problems <br />with GCMs, which suffer from several other limitations. Nonetheless, the resolution problem is critical for <br />hydrologic analysis, particularly in regions where hydrologic processes are dominated by orography. <br /> <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.