My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7997
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:57 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 4:30:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7997
Author
Nash, L. L. and P. H. Gleick.
Title
The Colorado River Basin and Climatic Change, The Sensitivity of Streamflow and Water Supply to Variations in Temperature and Precipitation.
USFW Year
1993.
USFW - Doc Type
EPA 230-R-93-009,
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
129
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />basin are predicated on streamflow data gathered within the last 80 years. In fact, the Colorado River <br /> <br /> <br />Compact of 1922 was based upon less than 20 years of data, and as a result allocated more water than is <br /> <br />likely to be available in an average year. The ability of this system to function under altered climatic <br /> <br /> <br />conditions has not been seriously considered. <br /> <br />Scenarios of Climate Chance for Imoact Assessment <br /> <br /> <br />To assess the implications of global warming for water resources, regional-scale details of future <br /> <br /> <br />changes are needed for temperature, precipitation, evaporation, wind speed, and other hydroclimatological <br /> <br /> <br />variables. Because our ability to predict these details is limited, climate-impact analysis must rely upon the <br /> <br />development of scenarios. Such scenarios can be either hypothetical or derived from General Circulation <br /> <br /> <br />Models (GCMs), paleoclimatic reconstructions, or recent historical climate analogues (WMO, 1987; USEPA, <br /> <br />1989). <br /> <br />Hypothetical scenarios are simple combinations of changes in variables (usually temperature, <br /> <br /> <br />precipitation, and potential evapotranspiration) that are consistent with global changes expected as a result <br /> <br /> <br />of the greenhouse warming. While such scenarios are limited by the fact that they may not be internally <br /> <br /> <br />consistent, they provide a very useful means of testing hydrologic vulnerabilities. If constructed <br /> <br /> <br />systematically, hypothetical scenarios can be used to develop sensitivity studies that delineate the relative <br /> <br /> <br />importance of changes in temperature and precipitation to changes in runoff. Subsequently, as estimates <br /> <br /> <br />of future temperature and precipitation improve, the impacts on water resources can be easily estimated. <br /> <br />Table 1 lists the range of hypothetical scenarios used in a variety of studies. The values chosen <br /> <br /> <br />typically reflect best estimates of changes in important climatic variables, although extreme values are <br /> <br /> <br />occasionally chosen to explore where a system might fail to perform as expected or designed. Thus, the <br /> <br /> <br />practice of using hypothetical temperature increases of 1, 2. 3. or tf Celsius reflects the consensus that <br /> <br /> <br />greenhouse warming will produce, temperature rises in this range, given an equivalent doubling of <br /> <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.