Laserfiche WebLink
<br />be a major Impact of climate change in hydrologic basins dependent on snowfall and snowmelt. One <br />scenario was run to study the effects of shifts in the seasonality of runoff. The results suggest that an <br />increase in temperature of only 20C would shift peak runoff one month earlier, to May, in the Upper Basin. <br />Under current operating conditions, such a shift in timing reduces the overall efficiency with which the <br />system is operated, reducing effective storage and deliveries, and increasing the average annual salinity. <br />We recommend that changes in operations to account for changes in the timing of runoff should be <br />evaluated. <br /> <br />Summary and Discussion <br />The results of this assessment suggest that violations of the Colorado River Compact are likely to <br />occur under all scenarios of decreased runoff, assuming that no changes in the operating parameters of the <br />system occur. For instance, storage strategies and targets work extremely well In the base case scenarios <br />but are substantially less effective under alternative scenarios. Thus, violations of the Compact would <br />potentially occur even if runoff dropped only 5 percent. The sensitivity of storage to changes in runoff reflect <br />how carefully the current system is operated and how little room there is for forecast error If water supply <br />is to be maximized without resulting in damaging flood-control releases or uncontrolled spills. <br /> <br />As might be expected, the reservoir simulation results presented here suggest that many of the <br />procedures and inputs used In the Bureau of Reclamation model are closely tuned to the historic hydrologic <br />record. While It is likely that many of the severe impacts noted here could be avoided under different <br />operating conditions and rules, we were constrained in the current study from evaluating any alternative <br />operating criteria. <br /> <br />The problem of planning water management in the face of a high degree of climate and hydrological <br />uncertainty cannot be easily resolved; nonetheless, it may be possible to increase flexibility In water <br />management. This flexibility will need to be reflected In technical and operational decisions, as well as in <br />the legal and economic Institutions that govern water use In the basin. <br /> <br />The problem of planning Is compounded by the fact that we cannot say with certainty whether runoff <br />in the basin will Increase or decrease. Most people with an Interest In the basin have focused on the <br />prospect of long-term decreases In runoff and the shortages that would result, which Is a logical reflection <br />of the region's preoccupation with drought. The fact that average temperatures In the region will almost <br />certainly Increase suggests that, If we assume no knowledge about changes In precipitation, we would <br />expect runoff to decrease as a result of increases In evaporation and vegetative water use. This may be <br />reason enough to plan for supply shortages; but Increased water storage must be traded off against the <br />need for flood-control space. The greatest risk of climatic change Is the potential for streamflow variability <br />to Increase substantially, Increasing the frequency of both sustained drought events and high-flow events. <br /> <br />xiii <br />