Laserfiche WebLink
<br />" <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />upstream, and particularly in downstream reaches of the main channels, where <br />razorback sucker larvae drift as the flooded areas from high streamflows recede. <br />If adequate control of nonnative fishes cannot be achieved, human intervention <br />may be required to rear razorback suckers in predator-free off-channel habitats <br />so that their populations can be maintained through augmentation stocking. <br /> <br />II. INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />Many riverine fish species exhibit seasonal movements into inundated floodplain <br />habitats for spawning, rearing, and foraging (Finger and Stewart 1987; Lambou <br />1963; Ross and Baker 1983). Seasonal flooding of bottomlands are important in <br />sustaining various fish species that are characteristic of river channels (Baker <br />and Killgore 1994). Baker and Killgore emphasize that the pattern of flooding <br />appears to be of paramount importance in structuring wetland fish communities and <br />that fish may spread over large areas of the floodplain during high streamflows. <br />The 1 atera 1 movement of fi sh on the fl oodp 1 a in decreases exponent i all y with <br />reductions in streamflow (Kwak 1988) and recruitment may not occur if water <br />levels remain low (Starrett 1951). A higher riverine fish standing stock was <br />associated with high spring floods in the Atchafalaya floodplain in the lower <br />Mississippi River whereas the standing stock was lower following low spring <br />floods (Bryan and Sabins 1979). Osmundson and Kaeding (1989a, 1989b) and Tyus <br />and Karp (1989) suggested that floodplain habitats were historically used as <br />nursery sites by native fish species in the Upper Colorado River Basin. During <br />high spring runoff, adult razorback suckers congregate in large eddies at the <br />mouths of ri vers, flooded bottoml ands, and off-channel ponds that have a <br />connection to the rivers (Tyus and Karp 1990). Ripe female razorback suckers <br />were collected from a large embayment on the Walter Walker Wildlife Area off the <br />Colorado River near Grand Junction, Colorado, indicating that spawning by this <br />species is not restricted to the riverine environment (McAda and Wydoski 1980). <br />Ripe razorback suckers were also collected at the outlet to Clifton Ponds along <br />the Colorado River near Cl ifton, Colorado (E. Wick, 1994, Personal <br />Communication). Several razorback suckers that became trapped in a gravel pit <br />known as Etter Pond along the Colorado River near DeBeque, Colorado, during the <br />high streamflows of 1983 and 1984 spawned successfully (F. Pfeifer, 1994, <br />Personal Communication) and captive razorback suckers spawned naturally and <br />successfully in earthen ponds at the Dexter National Fish Hatchery in New Mexico <br />(B. Jensen, 1994, Personal Communication). <br /> <br />It is hypothesized by some biologists in the Upper Colorado River Basin that the <br />food requirements of larval razorback suckers (Xvrauchen texanus), during the <br />critical period (Papilious and Minckley 1990) was met by the high productivity <br />of floodplain habitats in broad valleys of the Upper Colorado River Basin (Mabey <br />and Schiozawa 1993; Cooper and Severn 1994 a,b,c,d,e). The major reason for the <br />dec 1 i ne of endangered Colorado Ri ver fi shes is correlated with the 1 ack of <br />successful recruitment to maintain self-sustaining populations (U.S. Fish and <br />Wildlife Service 1987, 1990a, 1990b, 1991). In the Lower Colorado River Basin, <br />studies have demonstrated that predation by non-native fishes and the lack of <br />food limit the survival of larval and juvenile razorback suckers (Marsh and <br />Langhorst 1988; Papoulias and Minckley 1990, Papoulias and Minckley 1992). The <br /> <br />same factors appear to limit recruitment of the endangered Colorado River fishes <br />in the upper basin (Miller et al. 1982; Maddux et al. 1993). <br /> <br />2 <br />