Laserfiche WebLink
<br />the quality and quantity of food organisms during the early life stages (Hjort <br />1914, 1926) . High mortality of larval freshwater fishes has been attributed to <br />this critical period (Li and Mathias 1982). The density, size, timing, and <br />duration of zooplankton availability must "match" the timing of the swimup stage <br />of fish larvae. The highest survival of larval fish occurs when high densities <br />of zooplankton are present during the time when larvae begin exogenous feeding <br />(Hjort 1926). During years with optimum environmental conditions, high survival <br />of 1 arval and juvenil e fi sh produces strong year cl asses. The endangered <br />Colorado River fishes are long-lived and are known to produce strong year classes <br />(Henrickson and Brothers 1993; McCarthy and Minckley 1987, Miller et al. 1982; <br />Minckley et al. 1991; Vanicek 1967). The ultimate year-class strength of many <br />ri veri ne fi shes depends on the magnitude and durat i on of overbank fl oodi ng (i. e. , <br />the flood pulse) of floodplain habitats (Bayley 1991). <br /> <br />Starvation as factor in mortality was suggested by Marsh and Langhorst (1988) for <br />razorback sucker larvae in Lake Mohave and documented for the razorback sucker <br />larvae in the laboratory (Papoulias and Minckley 1990). Razorback sucker larvae <br />of about 10 mm total length were maintained in the laboratory at 18 C. Unfed <br />razorback larvae died in 10 to 30 days. Razorback larvae must find food of the <br />right size and density between 8 and 19 days to survive. The "point of no <br />return" or "point of irreversible starvation" when the fish died even though <br />sufficient food of the right size became available occurred between 19 and 23 <br />days for razorback sucker 1 arvae. Papoul i as and Mi nckl ey reported that the <br />minimum quantity of food required for survival of the razorback sucker larvae <br />during the critical period was 30-60 brine shrimp nauplii per fish per day to <br />survive when the larvae must be exposed to the right size and abundance of food <br />organisms. <br /> <br />Razorback sucker 1 arvae had good survi va 1 (80-90%) if the number of food <br />organisms available to each fish was 58 per day or higher (upper diagram; Figure <br />1) . However, the best growth duri ng 50 days after swimup occurred when the <br />number of food organisms was 527 per fish per day or higher (lower diagram; <br />Figure 1). In earthen ponds, razorback sucker larvae had excellent survival from <br />swimup to 8 weeks of age (77-98.8%) when the mean number of zooplankton per liter <br />was between 12.5 and 43.3 (upper diagram; Figure 2). There was no significant <br />difference between the treatments. However, growth of razorback sucker larvae <br />during the eight week period increased significantly with the density of <br />zooplankton (lower diagram; Figure 2). In another study, the survival of <br />razorback sucker fry in hatchery ponds at the Dexter National Fish Hatchery, New <br />Mexico, increased from 10.8-35.7% to 87.8-98.6% with changes in the fertilization <br />regime and stocking rate of fry (Hamman 1987). <br /> <br />IX. FOOD AVAILABILITY FOR LARVAL ENDANGERED FISHES <br />IN THE UPPER COLORADO RIVER BASIN <br /> <br />The larvae and juveniles of all endangered Colorado River fishes feed on <br />zooplankton (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1987, 1990a, 1990b, 1991). The first <br />foods of larval razorback suckers in ponds were diatoms, detritus, algae, and <br />rotifers (Papoulias and Minckley 1992). Soon afterward, the razorback larvae <br />began to select larger organisms such as zooplankton (primarily cladocerans). <br />The density of zooplankton needed for larval razorback sucker survival (30-60 <br />organisms per fish per day; Papoulias and Minckley 1990) occurred in flooded <br /> <br />9 <br />