Laserfiche WebLink
<br />benthic insects was highest for gravel with a mean diameter between 2.5 to 3.5 <br />centimeters. It was believed that this size of substrate was better to collect <br />detritus that was used as food by the grazers and scrapers than smaller gravel <br />(0.5 to 2.0 cm) or larger gravel (4.5 to 7.0 cm). The interspaces between the <br />2.5 to 3.5 cm gravel collected small detritus (primarily leaf fragments and soft <br />bark less than 4.0 mm in size) used as food by detritivores. Water velocity <br />decreased rapidly in the smaller gravel and was too great in the larger gravel <br />to accumulate small detritus. Predatory insects colonized the trays in relation <br />to the density of Rrey. Normal flow used as the control had a mean water <br />velocity of 48 cm S'l. The numbers of organisms was less in six out of sixteen <br />taxa that were studied when the flow was reduced to a mean water velocity of 11 <br />cm S.l. Si lt accumul ated in the substrate at the lower water vel oc it i es. The <br />substratum-detri tus interact i on was cons i dered most important in the <br />microdistribution of benthic insects. Water velocity or a light deposition of <br />silt were considered to be secondary. <br /> <br />The experimental results of Rabeni and Minshall (1976) are supported by the <br />literature of benthos in running waters (Hynes 1970; Welcomme 1985) that document <br />benthic macroinvertebrates in riffles with large cobble substrates produce a <br />higher diversity of species and larger numbers of organisms than river reaches <br />composed of sediments of sand and silt. Benthic invertebrates from productive <br />floodplain waters move or are flushed into the main channel, thereby providing <br />additional food to fishes in the main channel (Eckblad et al. 1984). <br /> <br />Obviously, different species of insects vary in their requirements and their <br />tolerance to these factors. However, inferences can be made to benthic insect <br />abundance and distribution in the Upper Colorado River Basin. Riffle areas with <br />large gravel substrate will be more productive than pools with sand substrate. <br />The low velocity habitats used by the larvae and juveniles of the endangered <br />fishes contain sand and silt substrates that would be expected to have a low <br />number of benthic invertebrate taxa. Chironomids are the most abundant benthic <br />invertebrates in these substrates that are eaten by large larvae and juveniles <br />of all species of endangered Colorado River fishes. This taxon would be the best <br />indicator of benthic insect production as food for juvenile endangered Colorado <br />River fishes. <br /> <br />VII. BENTHIC PRODUCTION IN DIFFERENT HABITATS OF THE MIDDLE GREEN RIVER <br /> <br />Since chironomids constitute a significant part of the diets in juvenile <br />endangered Colorado River fishes (Bestgen 1990; Grabowski and Hiebert 1989; U.S. <br />Fish and Wildlife Service 1990a, 1990b, 1991), this discussion will emphasize <br />that taxon in the benthic production of the upper basin. The juvenile endangered <br />fishes inhabit low velocity habitats such as embayments and backwaters along the <br />main channel where the substrate is composed of silt, detritus, and sand. This <br />is the type of substrate that is generally inhabited by chironomids. The numbers <br />of chironomids, found in the main channel of the middle Green River, ranged <br />between 360 to 4,645 organisms per square meter and the numbers ranged from 4,820 <br />to 28,860 organisms per square meter for backwater habitats in 1987 (Table 1; <br />Grabowski and Hiebert 1989). In 1988, Grabowski and Hiebert reported the range <br />in numbers of chironomids between 280 and 5,000 organisms per square meter for <br />the main channel of the river and between 3,330 and 28,890 organisms per square <br /> <br />7 <br />