My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7936
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7936
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:57 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 4:27:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7936
Author
McDonald, J. W.
Title
A Primer On Colorado's Water Policies.
USFW Year
1988.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />will be used and allocated, the state has had a clear policy on <br />water resources development for several decades. That policy, <br />which has been premised upon the objective of putting all of <br />Colorado's compact entitlements to beneficial consumptive use, <br />has had three major elements: <br />(1) Reliance on the federal government to finance, <br />construct and largely pay for (i.e., federal expenditures <br />were not repayable to the U.S. or were repayable only in <br />part and often without interest) major irrigation and flood <br />control projects, <br />(2) Reliance on industrial users to finance, construct, <br />and pay for their own water development projects, and <br />(3) ~Relianc.e on municipalities to finance, construct, and <br />pay for their own water development projects, with federal <br />loan and grant assistance being sought in the case of <br />smaller rural communities. <br />State government, of course, has actively participated in <br />only the first of these three areas. However, its support of <br />federal projects has led to substantial and tangible results. <br />In particular, the state policy .of seeking and promoting <br />federal projects has resulted in substantially greater amounts <br />of water being used in.irrigation than would have otherwise <br />been the case. This is because the federal government has <br />provided substantial subsidies which have enabled water <br />resources development to occur which would not have otherwise <br />occurred had water rights holders had to utilize private <br />financing to construct their projects. The federal <br />government's programs in this regard, and the state's <br />aggressive utilization of"them, reflect a major social policy <br />for settling the state, diversifying its economic base, and <br />realizing the beneficial consumptive use of its compact <br />entitlements. <br />In the face of reductions in federal funding programs, the <br />state embraced a major new policy in 1971 with the creation of <br />the Colorado Water Conservation Board (CWCB) construction <br />fund. The fund is used to make long-term, low interest loans <br />for the construction of new water resources projects and the <br />repair and rehabilitation of existing projects. Because the <br />terms of these loans are substantially more favorable than what <br />is available from commercial lending institutions, this program <br />represents an extension of the federal subsidization policy for <br />water resources development, albeit at a vastly reduced scale <br />given the limitations on the availability of state appropria- <br />tions to the construction fund. As with the federal programs, <br />the thrust of the CWCB construction fund program is to benefit <br />irrigated agriculture and small rural communities. <br />-5- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.