My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7920
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7920
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:57 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 4:27:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7920
Author
Van Steeter, M. M., J. Pitlick and B. Cress.
Title
Aerial Photograph/GIS Analysis and Field Studies of the Grand Valley and Ruby-Horsethief Canyon of the Colorado River.
USFW Year
1995.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
99
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I 7 <br /> <br />1993 AND 1994 FIELD STUDIES <br />Side channel/backwater habitats were the focus of the field study due to <br />their importance to both the adult and larval stages of the Colorado squawfish <br />and razorback sucker. Backwater morphology is partly dependent upon the <br />flow regime which controls the scour and fill of sediment. The high flows of <br />spring generally cause the backwater to become a side channel and fine <br />sediment that has accumulated on the bed is scoured. Some researchers <br />theorize that river regulation has decreased flows and caused a net filling of <br />these areas with sediment (Osmundson and Kaeding, 1991; Graf, 1978). The <br />relatively high (1993) and low (1994) peak discharges of the two years allowed <br />us to document the effects of flow magnitude on backwater morphology. <br />Methods <br />Three side channel/backwater sites were chosen and 25 cross-sections of <br />bed topography were surveyed before, during, and after the peak flows of 1993 <br />and 1994. All cross-sections were permanently marked with rebar or metal <br />fence posts. Standard surveying techniques were used to measure cross- <br />sections in areas of shallow flow. In deeper areas such as the main channel, <br />cross-sections were surveyed from a boat outfitted with depth sonar (Van <br />Steeter and Pitlick, 1994). Characteristics of the three sites are summarized in <br />Table 4. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.