Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />15 <br /> <br />River near the Colorado-Utah state line, near the downstream end of the <br />study area. The Palisade gauge is at the head of the Grand Valley above the <br />confluence of the Gunnison River, and the state line gauge is in Ruby- <br />Horsethief Canyon (Fig. 1). <br />The flows of 1993 were above average. Discharge began to increase in <br />late April, flows increased sharply in the beginning of May, and the peak flow <br />of 1,250 cms (44,300 cfs) occurred on May 28 which has a return period of <br />approximately 6 years (Fig. 8). Runoff continued into the middle of August. <br />In contrast, the flows of 1994 were below average, with a return period of the <br />peak flow of only 1.16 at the state line gauge. Flows did not increase <br />substantially until the second week in May, flows peaked at 370 cms (13,100 cfs) <br />on June 2, and runoff ended by the first week in July. Flows at the Palisade <br />gauge show similar trends and recurrence intervals, but are of a smaller <br />magnitude since they are upstream of the Gunnison River. The combined <br />effect of both the difference in magnitude and duration of flow is evident in <br />the mean annual discharge of the river in the two years. In the 1993 the mean <br />annual discharge was 240 cms (8,490 cfs), and in 1994 it was only 130 cms (4,590 <br />cfs). <br /> <br />The different flow magnitudes of these two years were ideal for our <br />studies of the affects of flow on channel morphology and sediment transport. <br />It allowed us to document stage-discharge relationships near bankfull <br />discharge in 1993, and to measure the effects of high and low flow years on <br />backwater morphology. <br />