Laserfiche WebLink
<br />The Corps <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />The development of new <br />Civil Works projects is beset <br />by a funding crisis - there <br />are simply insufficient <br />federal funds to start, finish <br />and operate all needed <br />projects. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />Major General John F. Wall <br />Director of Civil Works <br />US. Army Corps of Engineers <br />and <br /> <br />Kyle E. Schilling <br />Chief, Policy Studies Division <br />Institute for Water Resources <br />US. Army Corps of Engineers <br /> <br />As' state and local governments are asked to assume increased <br />responsibility for funding water projects, they are also beginning to seek <br />an increased role in planning and determiningpriorities for such projects. <br />The effectiveness of these closer "working partnerships" will require <br />modification of procedures and institutions both within and among <br />federal and nonfederal agencies. <br /> <br />The COlps of Engineers exemplifies growing awareness by a federal agency <br />of the need to adapt to changing times. In this official, unedited COlps <br />paper, General Wall formally charts a course of significant change for <br />the us. Army COlpS of Engineers. <br /> <br />The Civil Works program of the us. Army Corps of Engineers makes a unique <br />contribution to the development of our nation through water resources <br />planning, development and management. Investments in flood control projects <br />have prevented $146 billion in property damages at a cost of only $19 billion. <br />Each year, 25,000 miles of waterways handle two billion tons of cargo, resulting <br />in savings to consumers of about $1 billion over the next best transportation <br />alternative. Corps reservoirs provide 7.8 million acre-feet of municipal and <br />industrial water storage, serving millions of people; associated hydroelectric <br />plants provide over one-quarter of the nation's hydroelectric capacity and <br />generate about one-half of the energy provided by all federal power plants (fossil, <br />nuclear and hydropower). Nearly 4,000 recreation areas at over 600 Corps <br />reservoirs provide recreation opportunities to citizens who make nearly 500 <br />million visits to them each year. <br /> <br />Despite these notable contributions and the potential for additional productive <br />investment, the development of new Civil Works projects is beset by a funding <br />crisis - there are Simply insufficient federal funds to start, finish and operate <br />all needed projects. In the future, those who benefit must pay a greater share <br />of the costs. <br /> <br />Therefore, state and local governments are being asked to bear a higher <br />proportion of the costs of project planning and construction and to provide these <br />funds early-during the planning and construction periods. Local governments <br />and other non-federal participants will consequently demand a larger say in <br />project planning and priority setting. Although this greater participation may <br />result in more locally acceptable projects, it will require changes in the Corps <br />of Engineers' planning, design and construction processes. <br /> <br />FederaI/Non-Federal Partnership for Water Development <br /> <br />Initially, federal water development in the United States concentrated on <br />navigation - to facilitate commerce and to "open the West." Over time, the <br />federal role has broadened and now encompasses virtually all aspects of <br />comprehensive water resource development. Federal water development <br />provides widespread benefits, minimizes risks to human life, and achieves social <br />and regional development goals. <br /> <br />21 <br />