My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7908
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7908
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:57 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 4:22:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7908
Author
Valdez, R. A. and R. J. Ryel.
Title
Life History and Ecology of the Humpback Chub (
USFW Year
1995.
Copyright Material
NO
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
363
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />2-6 . Chapter 2 <br /> <br />A. Season <br /> <br />J <br /> <br />o <br /> <br /> <br />J <br /> <br />B. Time of Day <br /> <br /> <br />Sunset <br /> <br />Final Report <br /> <br />1982, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service <br />1987, McAda et al. 1994). <br /> <br />A <br /> <br />Gill nets were 30.5 m long and 1.8 m <br />deep with 3.8 or 5 .1-cm square mesh <br />(100 ft x 6 ft deep, 1.5 or 2-in mesh). <br />Experimental gill nets were also used <br />with four sections of 1.3, 2.5, 3.8, <br />5.1-cm mesh (0.5, 1, 1.5, and 2-in). <br />Trammel nets were 22,9 m long and <br />1.8 m deep (75 ft x 6 ft) with three <br />panels of netting--two outer walls of <br />30.5-cm (l2-in) mesh and one inner <br />panel of 1.3, 2.5, or 3.8-em mesh <br />(0.5, I, or 1.5-in). Gill and trammel <br />nets were made of double knotted <br />#139 multifilament twine with 1.3-cm <br />(0.5-in) diameter braided <br />polyfoamcore float line and 0.8-em <br />(5/16-in) leadcore line. <br /> <br />Gill and trammel nets were typically <br />tied to shore, and stretched along the <br />channel bed with net weights <br />anchoring each end of the leadline <br />(Fig. 2-4). Polypropylene mesh bags <br />were filled with rocks and used as net <br />weights. White mooring buoys were tied to the <br />distal end of each net line as marker floats to <br />facilitate relocation and retrieval of nets, and to alert <br />boaters of submerged nets. Nets were also <br />suspended in the water column to sample midwater <br />habitat. Nets were checked at intervals of about 2 <br />hr to minimize stress and reduce mortality of <br />entangled fish. Nets clogged with algae <br />(Cladophora glomerata) or debris were replaced and <br />cleaned regularly. <br /> <br />Fig. 2-3. Temporal stratified sampling design for seasons (A) and time <br />of day (8). <br /> <br />summer (June-August), and fall (September- <br />November), and by time of day to represent night, <br />dawn, day, and dusk. Since day length and <br />photoperiod varied with season, a computer <br />program (Sun and Moon Events Worksheet, Heizer <br />Software, Inc., Palo Alto, CA) was used to <br />appropriately adjust diel time blocks. <br /> <br />FISH SAMPLING METHODS <br /> <br />Twenty-four different gear types'or methods were <br />used to sample fish. Descriptions and codes for <br />each type or method are presented in Table 2-2. <br /> <br />Gill and Trammel Nets <br />Gill and trammel nets were the primary gear used to <br />sample assemblages of large fish in deep habitats <br />and to capture adult humpback chub for implanting <br />radio transmitters. Nets were used to collect fish for <br />comparing distribution and abundance by area and <br />time, as well as to characterize general adult fish <br />habitat to supplement radiotelemetry data. These <br />types of nets are commonly used to survey and <br />monitor other populations of humpback chub in the <br />Upper Colorado River Basin (Valdez and Clemmer <br /> <br />Hoop Nets <br />Hoop nets were used in various shoreline habitats. <br />Three sizes of hoop nets used included 0.6 m x 3.0 <br />m x 1.3-cm (2 ft x 10 ft x 0.5-in), 0.9 m x 4.0 m x <br />2.5-em (3 ft x 13 ft x I-in), and 1.2 m x 4.9 m x <br />1.3-cm (4 ft x 16 ft x I-in) (diameter x length x <br />square mesh). Two 7.6-m (25-ft) wings with 2.5- <br />em (I-in) mesh were attached to the opening of the <br />hoop nets. Hoop nets were set by anchoring the rear <br />of the net with a length of rebar and orienting the <br />throat in a downstream direction to capture fish <br />moving upstream (Fig. 2-5). Hoop nets were <br />checked at least every 8 hr to minimize stress and <br />mortality to fish. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.