Laserfiche WebLink
<br />xviii . Preface <br /> <br />non-native species. This multispecies approach, <br />balanced ~th the needs of other resources, will <br />provide a meaningful approach to managing the <br />Grand Canyon ecosystem. <br /> <br />While this report presents new and valuable <br />information on the humpback chub in Grand <br />Canyon, it is naive to assume that one study can <br />provide "all there is to know" about this population, <br />let alone give a full understanding of the aquatic <br />ecosystem in the canyon. While such complete <br />information would be valuable in fully assessing <br />effects of dam operations, a complete ecological <br />study would require time and thorough planning <br />(Marzolf 1991). Instead, the research process of <br />this study focused on specific aspects of life-history <br />and ecology which were deemed important for the <br />population and which may be affected by dam <br />operations. This study was constrained by available <br />research techniques (some of which were developed <br />during this project), modified dam operations, <br />concerns for personal safety, time, and money. <br />Despite these constraints, valuable information was <br />gathered and we feel that this report provides a <br />reasonable characterization of the species as we <br />know it today. <br /> <br />The study design, pwpose, and objectives of this <br />study were developed to integrate with other <br />investigations. Parallel and simultaneous studies of <br />the life-history and ecology of the species in the <br />Little Colorado River were conducted by other <br />researchers. The various research activities now <br />need to be integrated to produce a broad and more <br />comprehensive picture of humpback chub ecology in <br />the Grand Canyon, and to more fully assess the <br />effects of Glen Canyon Dam. Such integration must <br />extend to other disciplines, where they affect the <br />species, including geomorphology, climatology, <br />water quality, and other biological components of <br />the ecosystem. In addition, a more complete <br />understanding of humpback chub, both in terms of <br />ecology and population viability, will require <br />integrating information from populations throughout <br />the basin. This integration will provide a basis for <br />designing more broad-based ecological studies for <br />fishes within the entire Colorado River Basin. <br /> <br />Specific recommendations for management of Glen <br />Canyon Dam are not included in this report. <br />Instead, the effects of various operational <br />components on humpback chub were assessed in <br /> <br />Final Report <br /> <br />order to provide the information to Reclamation and <br />other cooperators of dam operations. We recognize <br />that recommendations for dam operations are <br />beyond the scope of this work, and perhaps <br />premature until the integration process is completed <br />Assessing economic effects of dam operations <br />designed to minimi7.e impacts to humpback chub is <br />also beyond the scope of this work, but we <br />recognize the importance of cost in evaluating any <br />" <br />management scheme. Researchers should strive to <br />develop a consolidated and integrated information <br />base by which managers and administrators can <br />make informed decisions on dam management. <br /> <br />This report is intended as a scientific document for <br />agency administrators and the scientific community. <br />We endeavored to present our findings in a manner <br />that is readable and understandable to a wide <br />audience. We did this to make the document <br />informative and Useful, and as a tribute to the <br />unique fishes that live in Grand Canyon. Consistent <br />with this effort, we have provided English and <br />metric units of measure, either jointly for ease of <br />conversion or individually in commonly used terms. <br />For example, river flow is presented as cubic feet <br />per second instead of cubic meters per second and <br />locations are referenced in river miles instead of <br />kilometers. Scientific and common names are <br />consistent with nomenclature of the American <br />Fisheries Society List of Common and Scientific <br />N ames of the United States and Canada. The <br />editorial style of the North American Journal of. <br />Fisheries Management was used except where <br />abbreviations and scientific notation were awkward <br />(e.g., cubic feet per second was abbreviated 'cfs' <br />instead of ft3/s). A glossary and list of <br />abbreviations are provided to facilitate <br />understanding of scientific terms used in the text of <br />this report. <br /> <br />This report is presented as ten chapters. Following <br />the Introduction (Chapter 1) and Study Design <br />(Chapter 2) are a characterization of Hydrology <br />(Chapter 3) and Water Quality (Chapter 4). The <br />next four chapters describe life history aspects of <br />humpback chub, including Distribution and <br />Abundance (Chapter 5), Demographics (Chapter 6), <br />Habitat (Chapter 7), Movement (Chapter 8), and <br />Food Habits (Chapter 9). The last chapter is an <br />Integration (Chapter 10) of information and a <br />discussion of effects of dam operations on the <br />humpback chub in Grand Canyon. An Executive <br />