Laserfiche WebLink
<br />viii . List of Tables <br /> <br />Final Report <br /> <br />Table 6-5. Summary of back-calculated total length (mm) at each annulus (A~ and transition <br />check (T J, based on the linear regression formula: TL=34+12.7 (Sr), for 84 <br />humpback chub collected from the mainstem Colorado River in Grand Canyon, 1992- <br /> <br />93. "",.'.,..,..,..........,.,...'".........................,.........., 6-22 <br />Table 6-6, Growth rates of humpback chub (:2150 mm TL) in the mainstem Colorado River by <br />50-mm length intervals, based on recapture of PIT-tagged fish, October 1990 - <br />November 1993. Data are compared to growth rates reported by Minckley (1992) . , . . . . . 6-23 <br />Table 6-7. Estimated numbers (N) and 95% confidence intervals (C.I.) of adult humpback chub <br />(:2200 mm TL) in nine mainstem aggregation, . . . . . . . , . . . . , . . , . , . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-25 <br />Table 6-8. Estimated population (N) of adult humpback chub (:2 200 mm TL) in the LCRI <br />aggregation using 11 estimators for closed population models . . . . . . . . . , . . . . , . . . , . . . . 6-26 <br />Table 6-9. Estimated total population (N) and survival (S) for adult humpback chub (:2 200 mm <br />TL) for the LCRI aggregation for 13 seasonal periods, 1991-1993, using estimators <br />for open population models A, B, and 0 , . . , , . . . . . . . . . . . , , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-27 <br />Table 6-10. Estimated population (N) of adult humpback chub (:2 200mm TL) in the MGG <br />aggregation using seven estimators for closed population models . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . 6-29 <br />Table 6-11, Estimated population (N) of adult humpback chub (:2 200mm TL) in four aggregations <br />in the mainstem Colorado River in Grand Canyon ,.... . . . , . . , . . . . . , . . . .. . . . . . . . . . 6-29 <br />Table 6-12. Exponential decreases in density of subadult humpback chub (<200 mm TL) for <br />electrofishing, seines, and minnow traps in the mainstem Colorado River from the <br />LCR (RM 61,3) to Lava Canyon (RM 65.4) . . , . . . . . . , . . , , . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6-31 <br />Table 6-13. Estimated total population size (N) of adult humpback chub (>300 mm TL) in the <br />LCRI aggregation. Annual estimates of N are shown for 1991, 1992 and 1993. Mean <br />estimates are also shown for 1991-1993 .,..,............................,.."..6-32 <br />Table 6-14. Estimated population size (N) of adult humpback chub (200-300 mm TL) in the LCRI <br />aggregation. Annual estimates of N are shown for 1991, 1992 and 1993. Mean <br />estimates are also shown for 1991-1993, and for 1991 and 1993 (excluding 1992) <br /> <br />combined .............,.................................................,. 6-32 <br />Table 6-15. Estimated total population size (N) of adult humpback chub in the LCRI aggregation <br />by combining estimates for chubs 200-300 mm (Table 6-14) and greater than 300 <br />mm TL (Table 6-13). Combined estimates are sum of means of each group. <br />Estimates are shown for all years, 1991-1993 and without 1992. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6-33 <br />Table 6-16. Sex ratios for adult humpback chub (:2200 mm TL) from three major aggregations in <br />the Colorado River in Grand Canyon, October 1990 - November 1993. .........,.....6-34 <br />Table 6-17. Average total length (TL in mm) and weight 0NT in g) for adult male (M) and female <br />(F) humpback chub (:2 200 mm TL) from the Colorado River in Grand Canyon, <br />October 1990 - November 1993 ............................................... 6-34 <br />Table 6-18. Number of eggs per female and corresponding lengths and weights of humpback <br />chub reported by different investigators. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . 6-35 <br />Table 6-19. Spawning condition of adult humpback chub in nine aggregations in the Colorado <br /> <br />River ..,..,..........,....................................".............. 6-36 <br />Table 6-20. Sizes of four predaceous fish species and susceptible sizes of humpback chub . . . . . . . . . 6-40 <br />Table 7-1, Shoreline types and definitions associated with fish habitat of the Colorado River in <br /> <br />Grand Canyon. ...........................................,.................. 7-5 <br />Table 7-2. Fish macrohabitat types and definitions for the Colorado River in Grand Canyon. . . . . . . . . . 7-f3 <br />Table 7-3. Habitat map sites for the Colorado River in Grand Canyon with flows and dates in <br />which maps were rendered, . . , . . . . . , . . . . , , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-7 <br />Table 7-4. Modified Wentworth classification for substrate particle sizes (Cummins 1962). ......,... 7-9 <br />Table 7-5. Geomorphic attributes of the river channel and numbers (percentage of total) of <br />adults captured in areas occupied by nine aggregations of humpback chub. . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-11 <br />Table 7-6. Number and percentage (%) of humpback chub captured and radio contacted in <br />offshore and nearshore macrohabitats compared to surface area of macrohabitats, <br /> <br />RM 57-65.4,1990-93 ,....................................................... 7-13 <br />Table 7-7. Characteristics and attributes of bathymetry for four eddy complexes in the Colorado <br /> <br />River, Grand Canyon. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . , . . . . . . . . . 7-19 <br />Table 7-8. Sample dates, times, flow, and temperature of the mainstem and LCR for <br />development of temperature isopleths in the LCR inflow. ......................,.... 7-20 <br />Table 8-1. Effort expended for telemetry surveillance and observation of radio-tagged adult <br />humpback chub of the LCRI and Middle Granite Gorge (MGG) aggregations . . . . . . , . . . . . 8-2 <br />