<br />Rnal Report
<br />
<br />downstream into areas with large numbers of brown
<br />trout. Brown trout are not presently stocked in the
<br />system and spawn primarily in Bright Angel Creek
<br />and the adjacent inflow.
<br />
<br />Rainbow trout also appear to be important predators
<br />of humpback chub and could consume up to 27,375
<br />fish per year. Rainbow trout that are sympatric with
<br />humpback chub are primarily progeny of local
<br />natural reproduction from tributaries such as
<br />Nankoweap Creek, Clear Creek, Bright Angel
<br />Creek, Shinumo Creek, Tapeats Creek, Deer Creek,
<br />and Havasu Creek. The area of highest potential
<br />predation (i.e., LCR to Bright Angel Creek) was
<br />supplied by fish that probably originated primarily
<br />from Nankoweap Creek, Clear Creek, and Bright
<br />Angel Creek. The rainbow trout that are sympatric
<br />with humpback chub downstream of Nankoweap
<br />Creek did not appear to originate from the tailwater
<br />fishery; only three of approximately 151,000
<br />catchable rainbow trout (marked with coded wire
<br />nose tags) released by AGF (1992 -1993) between
<br />the dam and Lees Ferry were recaptured
<br />downstream of Lees Ferry, at RM 2.9, RM 3.2, and
<br />RM 3.2. Rainbow trout may also compete for food
<br />with humpback chub, since favored food items of
<br />both species . were simuliids, amphipods, and
<br />midges. Limited food resources may be limiting
<br />native fish population size in western Grand
<br />Canyon.
<br />
<br />Channel catfish are apparently primarily mainstem
<br />inhabitants that aggregate annually for spawning in
<br />warm tributaries, primarily in the LCR, where they
<br />have been reported for years (Kaeding and
<br />Zimmerman 1983, Gorman et al. 1994). Channel
<br />catfish have not been reported in Kanab Creek
<br />(AGF 1993, 1994), and were not reported in recent
<br />surveys of the Paria River (Weiss 1993), Shinumo
<br />Creek, or Bright Angel Creek (Otis 1994).
<br />
<br />The effect of striped bass migrating annually from
<br />Lake Mead into Grand Canyon has not been fully
<br />evaluated. Although the numbers ascending
<br />annually from Lake Mead appear small, this species
<br />is a voracious predator and even small numbers
<br />could account for substantial mortality of native
<br />fishes. The numbers of striped bass in the Lake
<br />Mead inflow (i.e., downstream of Bridge Canyon) in
<br />spring are high (Valdez 1993, 1994, 1995), and
<br />suggest that greater numbers of striped bass could
<br />ascend the Colorado River into Grand Canyon given
<br />
<br />Executive Summary . 17
<br />
<br />more suitable conditions such as warmer
<br />temperatures and higher turbidity.
<br />
<br />Small non-native forms, such as fathead minnow
<br />and plains killifish, are presently low in numbers but
<br />could become numerous with changed conditions,
<br />such as warmer mainstem temperatures. These
<br />species are relatively weak swimmers and, in their
<br />native waters, inhabit low-velocity areas. Fathead
<br />minnows thrive in flood bottomlands and
<br />backwaters in the Mississippi and Missouri rivers
<br />and are often the most resistant species to low
<br />oxygen, high temperature, and high turbidity
<br />(Pflieger 1975). Plains killifish are typically
<br />inhabitants of small to medium streams and prefer
<br />low velocity areas. These warmwater species are
<br />likely to become transported downstream and
<br />stressed with high flows that flood sheltered
<br />shoreline habitats such as backwaters. These
<br />species are likely to remain in the system, since they
<br />inhabit many tributaries from which they can
<br />reinvade the mainstem. Red shiners, a known
<br />predator and competitor of native stream fishes, are
<br />rare upstream of the Lake Mead inflow, but could
<br />become numerous if suitable conditions (primarily
<br />warmer temperatures) are available (Valdez et al.
<br />1995).
<br />
<br />Biomass estimates indicate that fish biomass in the
<br />mainstem is dominated by non-native species. If
<br />food is limiting, removing potential predators may
<br />also benefit native species by availing greater
<br />supplies of food.
<br />
<br />Two species of alien parasites presently infect the
<br />humpback chub in Grand Canyon, including the
<br />parasitic copepod (Lernaea cyprinacea) and the
<br />Asian tapeworm (Bothriocephalus acheilognathi)'
<br />Parasitic copepods were first reported from this
<br />population by Carothers et al. (1981), and the Asian
<br />tapeworm was first reported in 1989 by D.
<br />Hendrickson (Angradi et al. 1992). These
<br />warmwater parasites are unable to complete their
<br />life cycles in the cold mainstem. Lemaea cyprinacea
<br />and Ii. acheilognathi were in found in 0.13% and
<br />3.6% of humpback chub examined, and were not
<br />considered a major threat in the mainstem,
<br />
<br />Of four native species captured in the mains tent
<br />Colorado River in Grand Canyon, flannelmouth
<br />suckers and bluehead suckers showed the weakest
<br />age structures for population stability, i.e., young
<br />
|