Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Rnal Report <br /> <br />downstream into areas with large numbers of brown <br />trout. Brown trout are not presently stocked in the <br />system and spawn primarily in Bright Angel Creek <br />and the adjacent inflow. <br /> <br />Rainbow trout also appear to be important predators <br />of humpback chub and could consume up to 27,375 <br />fish per year. Rainbow trout that are sympatric with <br />humpback chub are primarily progeny of local <br />natural reproduction from tributaries such as <br />Nankoweap Creek, Clear Creek, Bright Angel <br />Creek, Shinumo Creek, Tapeats Creek, Deer Creek, <br />and Havasu Creek. The area of highest potential <br />predation (i.e., LCR to Bright Angel Creek) was <br />supplied by fish that probably originated primarily <br />from Nankoweap Creek, Clear Creek, and Bright <br />Angel Creek. The rainbow trout that are sympatric <br />with humpback chub downstream of Nankoweap <br />Creek did not appear to originate from the tailwater <br />fishery; only three of approximately 151,000 <br />catchable rainbow trout (marked with coded wire <br />nose tags) released by AGF (1992 -1993) between <br />the dam and Lees Ferry were recaptured <br />downstream of Lees Ferry, at RM 2.9, RM 3.2, and <br />RM 3.2. Rainbow trout may also compete for food <br />with humpback chub, since favored food items of <br />both species . were simuliids, amphipods, and <br />midges. Limited food resources may be limiting <br />native fish population size in western Grand <br />Canyon. <br /> <br />Channel catfish are apparently primarily mainstem <br />inhabitants that aggregate annually for spawning in <br />warm tributaries, primarily in the LCR, where they <br />have been reported for years (Kaeding and <br />Zimmerman 1983, Gorman et al. 1994). Channel <br />catfish have not been reported in Kanab Creek <br />(AGF 1993, 1994), and were not reported in recent <br />surveys of the Paria River (Weiss 1993), Shinumo <br />Creek, or Bright Angel Creek (Otis 1994). <br /> <br />The effect of striped bass migrating annually from <br />Lake Mead into Grand Canyon has not been fully <br />evaluated. Although the numbers ascending <br />annually from Lake Mead appear small, this species <br />is a voracious predator and even small numbers <br />could account for substantial mortality of native <br />fishes. The numbers of striped bass in the Lake <br />Mead inflow (i.e., downstream of Bridge Canyon) in <br />spring are high (Valdez 1993, 1994, 1995), and <br />suggest that greater numbers of striped bass could <br />ascend the Colorado River into Grand Canyon given <br /> <br />Executive Summary . 17 <br /> <br />more suitable conditions such as warmer <br />temperatures and higher turbidity. <br /> <br />Small non-native forms, such as fathead minnow <br />and plains killifish, are presently low in numbers but <br />could become numerous with changed conditions, <br />such as warmer mainstem temperatures. These <br />species are relatively weak swimmers and, in their <br />native waters, inhabit low-velocity areas. Fathead <br />minnows thrive in flood bottomlands and <br />backwaters in the Mississippi and Missouri rivers <br />and are often the most resistant species to low <br />oxygen, high temperature, and high turbidity <br />(Pflieger 1975). Plains killifish are typically <br />inhabitants of small to medium streams and prefer <br />low velocity areas. These warmwater species are <br />likely to become transported downstream and <br />stressed with high flows that flood sheltered <br />shoreline habitats such as backwaters. These <br />species are likely to remain in the system, since they <br />inhabit many tributaries from which they can <br />reinvade the mainstem. Red shiners, a known <br />predator and competitor of native stream fishes, are <br />rare upstream of the Lake Mead inflow, but could <br />become numerous if suitable conditions (primarily <br />warmer temperatures) are available (Valdez et al. <br />1995). <br /> <br />Biomass estimates indicate that fish biomass in the <br />mainstem is dominated by non-native species. If <br />food is limiting, removing potential predators may <br />also benefit native species by availing greater <br />supplies of food. <br /> <br />Two species of alien parasites presently infect the <br />humpback chub in Grand Canyon, including the <br />parasitic copepod (Lernaea cyprinacea) and the <br />Asian tapeworm (Bothriocephalus acheilognathi)' <br />Parasitic copepods were first reported from this <br />population by Carothers et al. (1981), and the Asian <br />tapeworm was first reported in 1989 by D. <br />Hendrickson (Angradi et al. 1992). These <br />warmwater parasites are unable to complete their <br />life cycles in the cold mainstem. Lemaea cyprinacea <br />and Ii. acheilognathi were in found in 0.13% and <br />3.6% of humpback chub examined, and were not <br />considered a major threat in the mainstem, <br /> <br />Of four native species captured in the mains tent <br />Colorado River in Grand Canyon, flannelmouth <br />suckers and bluehead suckers showed the weakest <br />age structures for population stability, i.e., young <br />