7901 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

3. Over the next seven years, Navajo Dam will be operated under study guidelines to mimic a natural hydrograph, including test flows that consist of high spring flows followed by low summer, fall and winter flows. 4. At the end of the seven-year research period, Navajo Dam would be operated to mimic a natural hydrograph based on research flow recommenda- tions. 5. Reclamation affirms that releases of water from Navajo Dam specifi- cally for the purpose of restoring or enhancing the endangered fish must be legally protected before any depletions occur from the Animas-La Plata Project. Additionally, a Recovery Implementation Program for the San Juan River Basin has been signed by the Secretary and some of the participants. Not all parties that were signatory to the MOU have signed the cooperative agreement that implemented the San Juan River Recovery Implementation Program. The State of Utah has declined to become an official member of the Recovery Program, citing unresolved issues including water depletion. The Navajo Nation has been solicited to participate in the Program but-so far has declined due to concerns over protection of flows. In addition, the NPS petitioned to become a member of the Program in 1993 but was not accepted at that time. The Bureau of Reclamation is preparing a Supplement to the Final Environ- mental Statement (Supplement) for the Animas-La Plata Project to address issues arising since the original 1980 document Was completed. Work on the Supplement has been conducted with four main areas of emphasis: (1) Compliance with provisions of the Clean Water Act, (2) changed require- ments on certification of project lands for potential toxic or hazardous irrigation return flows, (3) new or updated information that has become available since the 1980 Final Environmental Statement and (4) evaluation of design and other refinements to the project Significant comments, both positive and negative, were received from Federal and State agencies, as well as the general public. Statements in support of the project, emphasizing compliance with the Colorado Ute Indian Water Rights Settlement Act, economic benefits of the project, and fulfillment of long-awaited Federal commitments, were received from State agencies and project sponsors. Statements in opposition to the project include: Inadequate NEPA analysis, inadequate 404(b)( 1) analysis, inadequate wetlands identifica- tion and mitigation and no updated analysis of project needs and alternatives to meet those needs. Based on the comments received on the draft, Reclamation is preparing a Final Supplement whicl'1 is scheduled to be filed with the EPA in April 1996. An updated economic and financial analysis was completed and provided to Congress in July 1995. 50 j