My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7901
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7901
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:57 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 4:18:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7901
Author
Upper Colorado River Commission.
Title
Forty-Seventh Annual Report of the Upper Colorado River Commission.
USFW Year
1995.
USFW - Doc Type
Salt Lake City, Utah.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
106
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />the virgin flow. Beginning in 1962, part of this depletion at Lee Ferry was <br />caused by the retention and storage of water in storage units of the Colorado <br />River Storage Project. The horizontal line (at approximately 15 million <br />acre-feet) shows the lo~g-term average virgin flow from 1896 through 1995. <br />Because the Colorado River Compact is administered on the basis of running <br />averages covering periods of ten years, the progressive ten-year average <br />historic and virgin flows are displayed on this chart. <br /> <br />The second chart on page 23, entitled Lee Ferry Average Annual Flow for <br />Selected Periods, is a graphical representation of historic and virgin flow <br />averages for several periods of record. The periods of water years selected <br />were those to which reference is usually made for various purposes in <br />documents pertaining to the Colorado River System. <br /> <br />Several important hydrologic facts are apparent from these two charts on <br />pages 26 and 27. <br /> <br />(1) A vast majority of the high flows occurred prior to 1929. <br />(2) Since the 1924-1933decade, the progressive ten-year average virgin <br />flow has not exceeded the average virgin flow except in the 1941-1950 and <br />the exceptionally wet 1975-1984through 1983-1992 decades. <br />(3) For the period 1896-1921, which is prior to the Colorado River <br />Compact of 1922, the average virgin flow was estimated to be 16.8 million <br />acre-feet per year, which is considerably greater than for any other period <br />selected, including the long-term average. A stream-gaging station at Lees <br />Ferry, Arizona was not installed until 1921. Thus, the virgin flow at Lees <br />Ferry prior to the 1922 Compact is estimated based upon records obtained <br />at other stations, e.g. the stream gage on the Colorado River at Yuma, <br />Arizona for the period 1902-1921. <br />(4) For the longest period shown, 1896-1995, the estimated average <br />annual virgin flow is 14.8 million acre-feet and the average annual historic <br />flow is 12.2 million acre-feet. <br />(5) For the next longest period, 1906-1995, the estimated average <br />annual virgin flow is 15.0 million acre-feet and the average annual historic <br />flow is 12.0 million acre-feet. Many of the early records for this series of <br />years, as well as for the 1896-1995 period, are based upon the estimates of <br />flows made at other gaging stations, as mentioned in (3) above. This <br />average is about equal to the 15.0 million acre-feet estimated for the <br />1906-1967 period which was used as the basis for justification of a water <br />supply for the Central Arizona Project authorized in 1968. <br />(6) The estimated average annual virgin flow during the 1914-1995 <br />period is 14.7 million acre-feet. This period is an extension of the 1 914-1 965 <br /> <br />25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.