Laserfiche WebLink
with Service technology centers, field stations, tribes, and other states and federal agencies. • <br />Captive broodstocks serve as an "insurance policy" if the wild stocks become extirpated and <br />provide fish for experimental studies that are part of the restoration or recovery efforts. <br />Planned captive propagation should minimizes the production of excess fish. <br />In the absence of natural reproduction and restoration of natural spawning habitats, a genetic <br />preservation program must be initiated that includes a culture program. Starting this <br />recovery activity before the wild population has been reduced to a low number of individuals <br />increases its chances of success and minimizes the likelihood of extinction (IUCN 1987). <br />This strategy provides time to solve husbandry problems, increases the probability that <br />adequate wild fish can be removed to give the new captive population a secures genetic and <br />demographic foundation, and minimizes adverse effects of removing individuals on the wild <br />population (Ralls and Ballou 1992). Captive populations should be managed to maximize <br />genetic diversity and heterozygosity to counter unwanted genetic changes in captivity due to <br />selection (Frankham et al. 1986) and avoid possible deleterious effects of inbreeding (Ralls et <br />al. 1988). Without genetic variation, the captive individuals or their reintroduced progeny <br />would be unable to adapt to future environmental changes (Frankel and Soule 1981) and <br />various management strategies, such as within-family selection against recessive lethal or <br />serious pathologies (Foose et al. 1986). The captive individuals must be housed (refugia) in <br />such a way that the parentage of all offspring is known with certainty, and detailed records <br />on all individuals born in captivity must be recorded. Refuges serve a vital function in • <br />maintaining and protecting the genetic integrity of the species. <br />A captive breeding and rearing program should be designed and conducted to reduce the <br />risks of drift, selection, and inbreeding; and the hatchery stock should be founded with a <br />sufficient number of individuals to accurately reflect the genetic composition of the natural <br />population from which it was derived. Genetic profiles of each wild population need to be <br />developed and minimum effective population sizes estimated and set as a goal. Based on <br />these data, a certain number of wild brood fish are randomly captured and marked (tagged) <br />from a designated population in association with spawning. Non-lethally sampled tissues <br />must be taken from each wild fish for genetic identification and characterization. The <br />number of wild fish removed at any one time must not adversely impact the genetic character <br />and productivity of the donor population (Williamson 1992). In association with the captive <br />broodstock management program, genetic risk assessment should be accomplished to make <br />sure activities conducted do not impose an undo genetic burden upon the population and that <br />genetic conservation be practiced for all fish stocks. Genetic risk assessment has identified <br />four types of genetic risk: 1) extinction, 2) loss of within population variability (genetic <br />drift and founder effect), 3) loss of between-population variability, and 4) domestication <br />selection. <br />Genetic Management Guidelines For Listed And Candidate Fish Species In Region 6 provides <br />a conceptual framework for genetics management and rationale for maintaining genetic <br />diversity of wild and captive listed and candidate fish species. Every aspect of the controlled •