Laserfiche WebLink
<br />synthetic chemicals to provide the necessary olfaction cue to the fish when <br />they mature. The same synthetic chemical will be dripped into the Middle <br />Green River during the spawning seasons following the time that the fish <br />mature to attract them to a suitable spawning site (Scholz et al. 1993). <br /> <br />Physical ConditioninQ and Exposure to Natural Food Organisms. Pond-reared <br />fish that are stocked into the river may not be able to cope with the riverine <br />environment unless they are physically conditioned before release {Sanger <br />1993} that may result in reduced survival. Another possibility is that the <br />fish fed pelleted food may not adapt to feeding on natural food organisms and <br />that the fish basically "starve to death II after release. Both the bony tail and <br />razorback sucker releases of radio-tagged fish exhibited delayed mortality so <br />something other than, or in addition to, physical conditioning (e.g., <br />behavioral alteration) may be involved (Cranney and Chart 1993; Burdick 1995). <br />It is possible that the large radio-tag that is implanted in the abdomen of <br />these fish resulted in delayed mortality of the fish. If that is the case, <br />the use of PIT-tags would be much less stressful to the fish and should result <br />in increased survival. Fish released in September or October during low <br />streamflows should be able to become physically conditioned for life in the <br />riverine environment prior to high flows during the following spring. <br /> <br />MonitorinQ of stocked Fish. A basin-wide monitoring program is being <br />developed through the RIP flooded bottomland enhancement and restoration <br />program by Dr. Robert Muth, Larval Fish Laboratory, Colorado State University. <br />An experimental field study will be conducted in 1996 that will be used to <br />develop a monitoring program that will be suitable for the razorback sucker. <br /> <br />Sampling of the stocked fish will be made following the guidelines and <br />protocol that is adopted by the Recovery Program participants from the 1996 <br />experimental field study. The sampling for fish stocked in the Middle Green <br />River would be from the stocking location at the Split Mountain boat ramp <br />downstream through the Ouray National Wildlife Refuge to Sand Wash. <br /> <br />DisDosition of SurvivinQ Razorback Suckers. The intent is to stock all <br />surviving razorback suckers into the Green River if the fish meet the <br />"Genetics Management Guidelines" (Williamson and Wydoski 1994). <br /> <br />If the fish do not meet the "Genetics Management Guidelines", disposition will <br />follow the "Guidelines for Disposition of Captive-Reared Endangered Fish" <br />(Appendix A in Stempel and Wydoski 1995). <br /> <br />VI. REFERENCES <br /> <br />Allendorf, F.W. 1993. Delay of adaptation to captive breeding by equalizing <br />family size. Conservation Biology 7: 416-419. <br /> <br />Bestgen, K.R. 1990. Status review of the razorback sucker, Xvrauchen <br />texanus. Colorado State University, Fort Collins. Larval Fish Laboratory <br />Contribution 44. 92 pp. <br /> <br />Burdick, B.D. 1992. A plan to evaluate stocking to augment or restore <br />razorback sucker in the Upper Colorado River. U.S. Fish and Wildlife <br />Service, Colorado River Fishery Project, Grand Junction, Colorado. 56 pp. <br /> <br />7 <br />