My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7880
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7880
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:57 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 4:13:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7880
Author
Wydoski, R. S.
Title
Augmentation Plan For Razorback Sucker In The Middle Green River, 1996-1997.
USFW Year
1996.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Although some natural recruitment is occurring based on the capture of <br />razorback suckers 480 mm TL or smaller, the present natural recruitment is <br />considered inadequate to maintain a self-sustaining population indefinitely. <br /> <br />After considerable discussion, the Biology Committee recommended that the <br />Middle Green River razorback sucker stock be increased by 500 fish to 1,000 <br />adults. This stocking plan outlines the approach that will be used to assist <br />in accomplishing this goal during 1996 and 1997. <br /> <br />III. BACKGROUND <br /> <br />The largest concentration of spawning razorback suckers in the Upper Colorado <br />River Basin occurs in the Middle Green River between RK 486.4 and RK 504.0 at <br />a site known as "Razorback Bar" (RK 311.5) when the water temperature averaged <br />14.1 C with a range of 9 to 17 C (Tyus and Karp 1990). Most ripe razorback <br />suckers (98%, n = 191) were collected in flowing water of riffles but, during <br />the high flows of 1986, 30% of ripe or tuberculated fish were captured in the <br />flooded river bottoms of Old Charley Wash and Stewart Lake Drain (Tyus and <br />Karp 1991). Twelve ripe razorback suckers were captured in Old Charlie Wash <br />(an off-channel lake with an inlet and an outlet) in late May and June (Tyus <br />and Karp 1990). These fish were in excellent condition suggesting that the <br />fish may use such sites after spawning to forage on abundant zooplankton as a <br />mechanism for restoring their condition following post-spawning. <br /> <br />These razorback suckers exhibited a high spawning fidelity to a specific <br />riffle (Tyus and Karp 1990) and the phenomenon of imprinting by razorbacks is <br />presently under study (Scholz et al. 1993). Twenty-six razorback suckers (22 <br />males and 4 females) in breeding condition were recaptured in the same <br />spawning reach in different years, indicating a strong fidelity to that site <br />(Tyus and Karp 1990). Tyus and Karp reported that six of the fish were <br />captured at that site in three different years. <br /> <br />McAda and Wydoski (1980) reported capturing 14 ripe razorback suckers (12 <br />males and 2 females) on a bar composed of cobble (20 to 50 mm in diameter) <br />that was located about 400 meters upstream from. the mouth of the Yampa River <br />during May of 1975. Other females that were captured nearby in the Green <br />River and Yampa River were not ripe, suggesting that females do not occupy <br />spawning areas until they are ready to spawn. Thirty-two ripe razorback <br />suckers were captured from the lower Yampa River during the spring of 1975, <br />1981, 1988, and 1989 (Tyus and Karp 1989). The average depth at the capture <br />site was 0.61 m and the average water velocity was 0.64 m/s. The average <br />water temperature was 13.8 C with a range of 10.5 to 16 C (Tyus and Karp <br />1990). Tyus and Karp reported a capture of a ripe male in the lower Yampa <br />River in 1988 that had been tagged at the same site in 1981 indicating a <br />fidelity to this spawning site. <br /> <br />Although razorback sucker spawn in the Middle Green River and produce numerous <br />larvae, low survival during the early life stages results in poor recruitment. <br />Poor survival is attributed, in part, to predation and competition from <br />nonnative fishes and starvation. Present nursery areas consist of backwaters <br />along the main channels that are dominated by nonnative fish species. <br />Zooplankton production in the main channels is extremely low in the upper <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.