Laserfiche WebLink
<br />August 1994 <br /> <br />FLOW REGIME AND RIPARIAN VEGET A nON <br /> <br />300 <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />fication in the Santee and Cooper river system in South <br />Carolina. Species-specific establishment or mainte- <br />nance criteria have also been used to explain patterns <br />of riparian vegetation and to assess impacts of hydro- <br />logic alterations. For example, Rood and Mahoney <br />(1990) explained the decline of western plains cotton- <br />wood forests downstream of dams by showing that the <br />altered flows less frequently meet establishment re- <br />quirements of cottonwood. <br />Franz and Bazzaz (1977) related the occurrence of <br />riparian trees to inundation duration and then pre- <br />dicted how backwater from a proposed downstream <br />reservoir would alter tree distribution. Harris et al. <br />(1985) used hydraulic simulation models of the In- <br />stream Flow Incremental Methodology (Bovee 1982) <br />to describe plant species distributions along belt tran- <br />sects orthogonal to the stream channel. We extend the <br />approach of Franz and Bazzaz (1977), using hydraulic <br />models similar to those of Harris et al. (1985), to pre- <br />dict the response of riparian vegetation to changes in <br />discharge. Our method uses a direct gradient analysis <br />to describe the present distribution of vegetation rel- <br />ative to inundation duration, as determined from a <br />flow-duration curve for an appropriate period of rec- <br />ord. A proposed dam or diversion has a predictable <br />effect on the flow duration curve. We use the new flow <br />duration curve in combination with our gradient anal- <br />ysis to predict the change in riparian vegetation for a <br />reach of the Gunnison River in south-central Colorado. <br /> <br />STUDY AREA <br /> <br />Black Canyon of the Gunnison National Monument <br />is located along the Gunnison River on the western <br />slope of the Rocky Mountains in Montrose County, <br />Colorado, at longitude 107045' west and latitude <br />38034'30" north. The Monument was established in <br />1933 in recognition of the scenic quality of the steep- <br />walled canyon cut into pre-Cambrian gneiss. In 1934 <br />there was little vegetation in the canyon bottom (War- <br />ner and Walker 1972), probably because ofthe com- <br />bined effects of alternating scouring floods and very <br />low flows (Zimmerman 1969). Between 1936 and 1976, <br />four dams were constructed on the Gunnison and Tay- <br />lor rivers upstream of the Monument for power gen- <br />eration and irrigation (United States Department of <br />the Interior 1990). Operation of the dams has reduced <br />peak flows and raised low flows, allowing development <br />of vegetation on the canyon bottom. This vegetation <br />could be affected by future changes in water manage- <br />ment. <br />The National Park Service chose a 450-m reach for <br />intensive study. The width of the canyon bottom with- <br />in this reach varies from 40 to 90 m, the gradient is <br />0.0128 m/m, and the elevation is ::::: 1707 m. The wa- <br />tershed area is 10000 km2 (Hansen 1987), and average <br />annual precipitation is 370 mm (Colorado Climate <br />Center 1984). Because of the steep canyon walls, the <br />study reach is inaccessible to livestock and has prob- <br /> <br />545 <br /> <br /> <br />~ 200 <br />'" <br />.S- <br />Q) <br />OJ <br />CB <br />~ <br />u <br />C/) 100 <br />(5 <br /> <br />1975 <br /> <br />1980 <br /> <br />1990 <br /> <br />1985 <br /> <br />Time <br /> <br />FIG. 1. Weekly average discharge of Gunnison River be- <br />low Gunnison Tunnel. <br /> <br />ably never been grazed. Discharge is measured at East <br />Portal, ::::: 14.5 river kilometres (distance along the riv- <br />er's path) upstream ofthe study reach at United States <br />Geological Survey Gage 09128000 (Ugland et al. 1989). <br />There are no dams, diversions, or important tributaries <br />between the gage and the study reach. Because the <br />closest dam upstream of the Monument is a reregu- <br />lation dam, the Black Canyon is not subject to the large <br />daily fluctuations in discharge associated with power- <br />peaking operation of some hydroelectric dams. Peak <br />discharge results from snowmelt and generally occurs <br />in June (Fig. 1). The physicochemistry of this portion <br />of the river is described by Stanford and Ward (1985). <br />Ours is the first detailed description of the riparian <br />vegetation of the Monument. <br /> <br />METHODS <br /> <br />Definitions <br /> <br />Five hydrologic terms are used frequently in this <br />paper. Discharge is the flow of a stream in cubic metres <br />per second. We used discharge data reported as daily <br />averages. The stage-discharge relation is a curve re- <br />lating discharge to the elevation of the water surface <br />at a cross-section or point. The flow regime is the pat- <br />tern of variation in discharge over time. Flow duration <br />is the fraction of time a given discharge is equalled or <br />exceeded. Inundation duration is the fraction of time <br />a point on the bottomland is inundated. Flow duration <br />and inundation duration are unitless quantities cal- <br />culated using the hydrologic record for an appropriate <br />period. The inundation duration of a point inundated <br />once a year for a day is the same as that of a point <br />inundated once every 7 yr for a week (0.00274). <br /> <br />Model overview <br /> <br />Our model is based on direct gradient analysis (Whit- <br />taker 1956, 1967, Bedinger 1979, Jongman et al. 1987), <br />which describes the position of vegetation along en- <br />vironmental gradients. We related vegetation to the <br />