My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7824
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7824
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:57 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 4:09:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7824
Author
Miller, W. H., et al.
Title
Colorado River Fishery Project, Part III, Final Report, Contracted Studies.
USFW Year
1982.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
349
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The onset of spawning closely followed an increase in river tem- <br />perature from 9 to 12° C over a 2-day period (Figure 2). Cool, rainy <br />weather prior to June 24 resulted in water temperatures in the 7 to 10° C <br />range. The temperature increase associated with spawning resulted from <br />clear, sunny weather on June 24 and 25. Spawning activity was inter- <br />rupted on July 7 when river temperature fell from 15 to 11° C and level <br />increase 10 cm overnight following cold rains. Temperature rose to 14° C <br />by the time spawning resumed and 18° C was reached by the completion of <br />spawning. Increasing temperatures through the spawning period were <br />accompanied by decreasing river discharge and a drop in river level of <br />30 cm. <br />The dates of the beginning and ending of spawning and of peak <br />activities varied between sites, although the same pattern was followed <br />at all sites (Figure 3). Spawner counts increased and peaked 1 week <br />earlier at the lowermost site than at the 3 upriver sites. At the up- <br />river sites fish appeared and began spawning at about the same time. <br />Spawning activity at the lower and uppermost sites ended a week earlier <br />than at the other sites. <br />Dates and water temperatures associated with spawning in the <br />St. Joe, St. Maries, and Clearwater Rivers in 1980 were comparable with <br />those documented in the St. Joe in 1981. Spawning was already in prog- <br />ress on the St. Joe River in 1980 when the first site was located on <br />July 1. River temperature increased from 11° C on that date to 16° C by <br />July 12, when spawners had dispersed. Spawners were not observed in the <br />• St. Maries River, but netting information indicated spawning was in <br />progress on June 10, 1980, at a river temperature of 10° C. Fish were <br />apparently still spawning on June 26, when water temperature was 12° C, <br />but was suspended by June 27 when river temperature fell 7° C in 2 days <br />following heavy rains. Whether activity resumed when favorable tempera- <br />tures were again reached is unknown. A school of 500 to 600 spawners <br />located in the Clearwater River on June 20, 1980, when the water tempera- <br />ture was 18° C, had dispersed by the following day. <br />Table 1 summarizes dates and water temperatures associated with <br />spawning by northern squawfish in this and other studies. In all <br />cases spawning occurred in June or July at temperatures between 10 and <br />20° C. Dates of spawning varied within this context as the required water <br />temperature were reached at different times. In Cooper and Seeley <br />Lakes (Hill 1962) and in Cascade Reservoir, spawning dates also varied in <br />successive years as conditions varied. Different temperature regimes <br />in tributaries to Cascade Reservoir were thought to explain the vari- <br />able spawning dates in that system. The variations in times of spawning <br />recorded in this study can also be explained by different temperature <br />regimes in successive years and in the different systems. <br />Site preference <br />A total of 9 spawning sites were scattered throughout an 18 mile <br />section of.the lower fastwater of the St. Joe River (Figure 4). Physical <br />conditions at the locations of egg deposition at each site are summarized <br />in Figures 5 and 6. Relatively deep areas in the river were favored by <br />53
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.