Laserfiche WebLink
Changes in wind speed factor could be used to reduce or entirely <br />eliminate the monthly mean differences, 6, at validation gages (Tables 5 <br />and 6). No attempt was made to calibrate UT163 because the data is <br />considered unreliable. Obviously, if the mean differences for all months <br />were reduced or eliminated at a specific gage, the annual mean difference <br />was also reduced or eliminated. However, a probable difference range for <br />each month would generally remain. In other words, calibration could <br />only reduce the bias, not necessarily remove all differences. <br />Table 5 <br />Wind calibration statistics: 1964-1977 <br />Green State <br />Month Jensen River line Cisco UT163 <br />January g 0.01 0.09 - 0.04 0.05 - 0.60 <br /> d ± 0.31 ± 0.22 ± 0.29 ± 0.11 ± 0.51 <br />February 6 0.00 0.01 - 0.01 - 0.04 - 0.30 <br /> d t 0.59 ± 0.47 ± 0.57 ± 0.54 ± 0.92 <br />March 9 0.00 0.01 0.02 - 0.01 0.62 <br /> d ± 0.55 ± 0.38 ± 0.51 ± 0.34 ± 0.57 <br />April 5 0.01 - 0.04 0.03 - 0.01 0.88 <br /> d ± 0.73 ± 0.37 ± 0.90 ± 0.67 ± 0.54 <br />May 9 - 1.37 - 0.01 0.00 0.05 - 1.43 <br /> d ± 1.19 ± 0.82 ± 0.49 ± 0.65 ± 0:61 <br />June 9 - 0.46 - 0.02 0. 06 - 0.00 - 2.04 <br /> d ± 1.46 ± 0.67 ± 0.53 ± 0.44 ± 0.80 <br />July b 0.01 0.06 - 0.01 0.04 - 1.10 <br /> d ± 0.99 ± 0.48 ± 0.55 ± 0.51 ± 0.65 <br /> <br />August <br />s <br />0.00 <br />- <br />0.04 <br />- <br />0.02 <br />0.01 <br />- . <br />0.21 <br /> d ± 1.12 ± 0.30 ± 0.44 ± 0.52 ± 0.65 <br />September ?, - 0.01 0.00 - 0.03 - 0.02 - 0.17 <br /> d ± 0.80 ± 0.38 ± 0.70 ± 0.64 ± 0.66 <br />October 9 0.06 - 0.00 - 0.02 - 0.04 0.42 <br /> d ± 0.47 ± 0.35 ± 0.36 ± 0.46 ± 0.92 <br />November g 0.02 0.00 - 0.02 0.02 - 0.16 <br /> d ± 0.54 ± 0.29 ± 0.34 ± 0-38 ± 0.69 <br />December s 0.00 - 0.04 0.00 - 0.05 - 1.52 <br /> d ± 0.76 ± 0.36 ± 0.28 ± 0.27 ± 0.69 <br />Annual 9 - 0.15 0.00 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.47 <br /> d ± 0.87 ± 0.44 ± 0.51 ± 0.47 ± 0.89 <br />Table 6 shows the monthly mean differences at each validation gage <br />for the normal (mean monthly average) calibrated conditions. One could <br />have just as easily calibrated on the normals and compared the results to <br />the historical temperatures. <br />0 <br />30