Laserfiche WebLink
Hydrology <br />The data file of gage discharges was developed from the U.S. Geo- <br />logical Survey, Water Resources Data for Colorado and Water Resources <br />Data for Utah. The discharges for each location were obtained from the <br />Surface Water Records. Water temperatures at each location were obtained <br />from Water Quality Records. Additional water temperature and discharge <br />information was obtained through the use of the USGS WATSTOR system. <br />Published Temperature Data Smoothing <br />Fifteen USGS gages within the study area provided some useful <br />instream water temperature data. However, none of the gage data were <br />developed from accurate 24-hour averages. The published temperatures <br />were assumed to represent water temperatures somewhere between the <br />minimum/maximum on the day recorded. Frequently, published temperature <br />data were missing for several days a month at each gage. Therefore, <br />monthly means of the average daily water temperature for a specific year <br />at any given gage were difficult to obtain directly. <br />A second-order, multiple regression model was used at each gage <br />to generate estimates of the missing data. The published water tem- <br />perature was treated as the dependent variable. Discharges at the <br />selected sites and prevailing meterological parameters (obtained from <br />published data for the Grand Junction weather station) were the independ- <br />ent variables. The meterologic parameters were based upon those used in • <br />the physical process model. Data from 1964 through 1977 was used for the <br />regression. <br />Water Temperature Screening, Black Rocks and Jensen Reaches <br />The water temperature model was used to predict mean monthly tem- <br />peratures across a range of discharges at the Black Rocks (Colorado <br />River) and Jensen (Green River) observation points. The Black Rocks <br />flow-temperature relationships were to be used in screening flow levels <br />for temperature suitability for humpback chub and Colorado squawfish <br />spawning. The Jensen predictions were to be used 1) to determine dif- <br />ferences between Green and Colorado River temperatures and 2) to screen <br />various flow levels during critical spawning months for temperature <br />suitability. On both rivers the months of May, June July, and August <br />were selected as potential spawning months for both species (May and <br />June primarily for humpback chubs, June, July and August for Colorado <br />squawfish). <br />Flow Time Series Generation <br />Mean monthly flow data for the six CRFP PHABSIM study sites were <br />obtained for the three flow conditions (actual, present, and natural) <br />specified in the Amendment to the MOU. <br />The "actual" flows were based upon USGS gage records adjusted to <br />the study sites by addition or subtraction of tributary flows,between the <br />12