Laserfiche WebLink
FIGURES, Continued <br />Tolerance and Preferences of Colorado River <br />Endangered Fishes to Selected Habitat Parameters, Continued <br />Number <br />8 Relative frequency distribution of selected temperatures <br />by juvenile Colorado squawfish. Data pooled for <br />third hour, one observation/minute for fish acclimated <br />to 140, 200, and 260 C. See Figure 3 for explanation <br />of figure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <br />9 Relative frequency distribution of selected temperatures <br />for adult Colorado squawfish. Data pooled for third <br />hour, one observation/minute for fish acclimated to <br />140, 200, and 260 C . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <br />10 Relationship of preferred temperature (mean of individual <br />modes) to acclimate temperature for Colorado squawfish. <br />Final preferendum is the point of intersection with <br />the 45 degree line (i.e. that point where selected <br />temperature = acclimation temperature). Open circles <br />represent juvenile fish; solid circles adult fish . . . . <br />11 Relative frequency distribution of juvenile Colorado <br />squawfish in 8 compartments of TDS gradient deviance <br />(Figure 2) with and without gradient established. <br />Numbers I, II, and III are replicates for controls <br />and treatments. Number over vertical bar is conduc- <br />tivity in mmhos. Data on location and conductivity <br />are values 24 hours after start of experiment . . . . <br />12 Relative frequency distribution of juvenile bonytail <br />chubs in 8 compartments of TDS gradient device <br />(Figure 2) with and without gradient established. <br />Numbers I, II, and III are replicates for controls <br />and treatments. Number over vertical bar is conduc- <br />tivity in mmhos. Data on location and conductivity <br />are values 24 hours after start of experiment . . . . . . <br />13 Relative frequency distribution in 8 compartments of <br />the TDS gradient device for pooled data from 3 <br />treatments and 3 controls for each species. Numbers <br />above vertical bar are the range of conductivity <br />(mmhos) for that compartment over the 3 treatments <br />(Figures 11 and 12) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <br />14 Relative frequency distribution of juvenile humpback <br />chubs in 8 compartments to TDS gradient device <br />(Figure 2) with and without gradient established. <br />Numbers I, II, and III are replicates for controls <br />and treatments. Number over vertical bar is conduc- <br />tivity in mmhos. Data on location and conductivity <br />are values 24 hours after start of experiment, N = 20, <br />8-12 cm fish/replicate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <br />15 Relative frequency distribution of juvenile humpback <br />chubs in 8 compartments to TDS gradient device <br />(Figure 2) with and without gradient established. <br />Numbers I, II, and III are replicates for controls <br />and treatments. Number over vertical 'bar is con- <br />ductivity in mmhos. Data on location and conductivity <br />Page <br />205 <br />206 <br />209 <br />212 <br />213 <br />214 <br />216 <br />• <br />• <br />r: <br />xvi