Laserfiche WebLink
<br />' <br /> established on several sand bars on the south shore which <br /> further stabilized the river channel. <br />' Two natural gas pipelines were constructed in the 1950s and <br /> 1970s in adjacent corridor alignments through the Preserve. <br /> The pipelines enter the Preserve from the Colorado River at <br /> the north end and exit at the southeast corner of the <br /> Preserve near Mill Creek. Natural gas may be leaking into <br /> ground water at the north end of the Preserve (Cooper 1994). <br />' <br /> Ferrell Gas, a natural gas storage facility, was constructed <br /> in the early 1960s adjacent to the east central boundary of <br /> the Preserve. The gas is stored in underground salt caverns <br />of the Paradox formation. <br />A power transmission line was installed running east to west <br />' across the south end of the Preserve. A raised road bed was <br />built under the lines for access. This road continues to <br />act as a barrier to surface water movement. <br />' In the late 1970s, a local partnership prepared the <br />northwest and west central portion of the Preserve for <br />' agricultural crops. To that end, a series of ditches and <br />dike were built across the Preserve to control surface water <br />and develop water for irrigation. A headgate was installed <br />near the river at the south end of the Preserve. A linear <br />' pond, called the north-pond, was constructed on the river <br />bank at the north end of the Preserve to store irrigation <br />water. The pond was diked which prevents overbank flows at <br />a point where flood waters had historically entered the <br />Preserve. The flows now enter the Preserve immediately <br />downriver of the pond. The west half of the northern <br />portion of the site was cultivated in 1979. A dike was <br />built along the west perimeter to hold back high river flows <br />in the early 1980s. In 1983, flood waters entered the <br />Preserve and the agricultural project was abandoned. <br />' Conclusion: Historic land use has negatively impacted <br />habitats of the Preserve. Current ownership of the Preserve <br />provides an opportunity to enhance habitat for razorback <br />sucker. <br />2. Vegetation <br />' Vegetation communities on the site vary depending on water <br />regime and salt concentrations. Cooper (1994) characterized <br />five vegetation communities as part of his aquatic habitat <br />characterization. These vegetation communities include open <br />water-aquatic, hardstem bulrush (Scirpus acutus), flooded <br />willow (Salix spp.), back water, and river communities. <br />9