7777 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Recently our board worked very hard in developing a mission statement. I think you might equate this to identifying the problem. The mission of the District is to provide its service area with adequate and reliable supplies of high quality water to meet present and future needs in an environmentally and economically responsible way. Let me tell you, our Board struggled over each and everyone of those words for a period of about six months, but members seem to be pretty comfortable with them today. A quick overview: we have not only 27 member agencies, but as I mentioned quite a few of those are districts. We have 250 incorporated cities and other communities, 15 million people, about half the state's population, half the state's gross product. We use 10 percent of the developed water being used in California. We've had very high reliability in supplies up until a couple of years ago. Our forecast for the future is for a relatively unreliable supply unless we are able to dramatically change how we do business. There are the three aqueducts to southern California. The first, built right after the turn of the century by the Los Angeles Department of Water Power, delivered half a million acre-feet of water a year between 1970 and 1988. Until 1988, Los Angeles was getting less than 10 percent of its water from Metropolitan. The Colorado River Aqueduct is a little over twice the capacity of the Owens Valley Aqueduct: 1.2 million acre-feet. Metropolitan has a contract for two million acre-feet of water a year, and as a matter of fact, two years ago, we took delivery of 'about 75 percent of that contract, and then we had local supplies, primarily groundwater, of 1.4 million acre- feet. You add all those numbers up, you get something like five and a half million acre-feet. Our recent water use was about four million acre-feet. Ten years or so ago, we looked fat and happy in terms of future water supply. What's changed? Well, we know we live on borrowed time on the Colorado River; we have less than a half million acre-feet assured supply from the Colorado. The Los Angeles Aqueduct, which I mentioned delivered half a million acre-feet from '70 to '88, delivered an average of less than 40 percent of that figure during the drought years of '89, '90 and '91. In one of those years it delivered less than 100,000 acre-feet. So, sometimes the past is not always a good predictor of the future. Los Angeles is having some problems with environmental issues, drought and the like. State Water Project: we have a contract for two million acre- feet. The State tells us they can give us about half of that, a million acre-feet, although in 1991 we got about half a million acre- feet. For that reason, we imposed rationing for the first time in the District's history: a 31 percent reduction in water use. . Southern California is blessed with water in its groundwater basin. The problem is, that's the good news. The bad news is we have water quality problems: organic contamination: nitrate problems in some of the interior basins where agriculture has been around for a 41