My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7777
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7777
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:56 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 4:01:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7777
Author
Ward, R. C.
Title
Proceedings 1993 Colorado Water Convention, Front Range Water Alternatives and Transfer of Water from One Area of the State to Another, January 4-5, 1993, Denver, Colorado.
USFW Year
1993.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
186
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />farmers within the basin so that no one farmer has to put up with that <br />burden for an extended period of time. <br /> <br />In addition, there can be municipal first-use agreements. The <br />proposal has been forwarded recently by the Barr lake ditch companies <br />that their facilities be somehow incorporated into the South Platte <br />municipal water supply system as an example of a municipal first-use <br />system. That is a third category of municipal-agricultural use that <br />we feel has an enormous potential to benefit both the agricultural <br />sector and the municipal sector. <br /> <br />Water use efficiency -- we have talked about this before. <br />Municipal water conservation is certainly something every individual <br />community is looking at. It has an additional value if you consider <br />it from an integrated system concept: if through cooperation and <br />integration of water supply systems individual communities could have <br />an opportunity to sell any excess water that they may have through <br />conservation or, conversely, buy any additional water supplies they <br />need that may be gained through municipal conservation. That would <br />provide more of a market which may provide additional incentive for <br />communities to look at water conservation. <br /> <br />Agricultural conservation -- certainly another area -- when you <br />have more than two million acre-feet a year being diverted, small <br />savings in the amount diverted and the amount consumed in certain <br />circumstances can result in significant savings to municipalities. <br /> <br />The fourth category is what I call the actual integration of <br />existing systems. It can take place in several ways. You can link <br />existing water supply systems and thereby gain certain benefits. The <br />proposed gravity pipeline from Carter Lake to the northern Denver <br />Metro area is an example of such a linkage. What can it do? It can <br />provide a way of moving available water that may be for sale in one <br />area into another area of the Front Range; It can provide an <br />alternate path of diversion for a portion of Denver's West Slope water <br />rights. Through the Windy Gap portion of Denver's Moffat and Frasier <br />Valley water rights could, with minor facility modifications, be <br />diverted down at the Windy Gap diversion facility and then back into <br />the northern metro area via the Carter Lake pipeline. That could have <br />the benefit of allowing better management of water on the Frasier <br />basin, increased yields to the East Slope, better instream flow <br />protection to the West Slope, and increased energy production through <br />the Colorado-Big Thompson hydropower facilities. <br /> <br />Coordination of existing systems -- Coordinated operation of <br />reservoir systems is another example of integrating existing systems; <br />for example, Aurora's Spiney Mountain Reservoir currently planned to <br />store water diverted under Aurora's Homestake projects, those existing <br />and those proposed, and in addition storage space to occasionally <br />capture South Platte flood flows. The full yield of the Spiney <br />Mountain project could be realized at an earlier point by changing a <br />portion of Denver's Two Forks rights so that they can be stored in <br />Spiney Mountain. That would increase the yield of this project not <br />over and above what it would eventually get when Homestake is fully <br />built out, but would provide for an earlier attainment of that portion <br />of the yield without significant facilities construction. <br /> <br />30 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.