My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7748
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7748
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:56 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 3:59:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7748
Author
Western Water Consultants, I.
Title
Final Report on Little Snake River Depletions by Pot Hook, Three Fork and Powder Wash Rights.
USFW Year
1990.
USFW - Doc Type
Laramie, WY.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
152
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />r <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br />1 <br /> <br />Powder Wash Project are discussed in Section 3.2.2 of this report. <br />As with Scenario No. 3, a firm yield study of Little Snake Reservoir was performed. <br />The final WIRSOS run was made with a constant power release demand of 160 c.f.s. This <br />was found to be the highest demand that could be met 100 percent of the time, therefore, <br />the results of this run were used to determine the impact of the Powder Wash Project <br />upon the flows at Lily, Colorado. <br />The Scenario No. 5 flows at Lily are presented in Table D.17. The average annual <br />flow at Lily for Scenario No. 5 was calculated to be 296,722 acre-feet. A comparison <br />between Scenario No. 5 flows and the Water Development Baseline flows is presented in <br />Table D.18. Average annual flows at Lily for Scenario No. 5 are 9,446 acre-feet lower <br />than the Water Development Baseline flows. Hydrographs comparing the flows at Lily <br />under Scenario No. 5 are shown on Figure D-31 through D-35. <br />4.6 SUMMARY OF RESULTS <br />A summary of the WIRSOS modeling results is presented in Table 6. Because the <br />effects of the projects will be monthly, hydrographs are presented. Each Scenario is <br />compared on five hydrographs. The first depicts the variation during the average of three <br />dry years, 1931, 1955 and 1961. The second for the average of the three average years, <br />1941, 1951 and 1956. The third for the average of three wet years, 1932, 1962 and 1979. <br />Hydrographs for the driest year (1977) and wettest year (1952) are also presented. <br />43 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.