My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7748
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7748
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:56 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 3:59:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7748
Author
Western Water Consultants, I.
Title
Final Report on Little Snake River Depletions by Pot Hook, Three Fork and Powder Wash Rights.
USFW Year
1990.
USFW - Doc Type
Laramie, WY.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
152
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />[I <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />The conditional water right amount for the Powder Wash Power Plant call for 800 <br />c.f.s. to be supplied by the Little Snake River and Little Snake Reservoir storage releases. <br />However, a constant demand of 800 c.f.s. could be met only part of the time during the <br />1930-82 period as Little Snake Reservoir inflows average only 430 c.f.s. As with the Three <br />Forks project, a firm yield study of the Little Snake Reservoir was performed. For the <br />initial Scenario No. 3 run, a constant power release demand of 225 c.f.s was evaluated. <br />The initial run with a 225 c.f.s. demand showed this demand was not met about 16 <br />percent of the time. Therefore, additional runs were performed with lower demands until <br />these demands were met. The last WIRSOS run made utilized a demand of 150 c.f.s. <br />This power release demand was met about 99 percent of the time. The results of this run <br />were used to determine the incremental impact of Powder Wash Project upon the flows <br />at Lily, Colorado. <br />The Scenario No. 3 flows at Lily are presented in Table D.12. Average annual <br />flows at Lily for Scenario No. 3 were calculated to be 203,099 acre-feet. A comparison <br />between Scenario No. 3 flows and Scenario No. 2 flows is presented in Table D.13. <br />Scenario No. 2 flows. The primary reason for this reduction is the increased evaporation <br />Average annual flows at Lily for Scenario No. 3 are 7,307 acre-feet lower than the <br />from the reservoir water surface. However, it is important to note that flows at Lily would <br />be higher during the winter and late summer than WDB flows with the Powder Wash <br />Project in operation. These comparisons are shown on Figures D-21 through D-25. <br />Comparisons of Scenario No. 3 with the WDB are shown on Table D-14. <br />41 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.