My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7740
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7740
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:56 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 3:53:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7740
Author
McAda, C. W. and L. R. Kaeding.
Title
Physical Changes in the Gunnison and Colorado Rivers Resulting from Construction of the Aspinall Unit and Related Projects, with Hypotheses to Assess the Effects on the Endangered Fishes
USFW Year
1991.
USFW - Doc Type
Final Report.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />STUDY PLAN <br />The Aspinall Unit and other Bureau of Reclamation projects have reduced <br />the volume of spring runoff in the Gunnison and Colorado rivers. Spring <br />runoff is the most important variable in determining the physical environment <br />of the river during the coming year. This report discusses several ways in <br />which this altered streamflow may have effected the endangered fishes. The <br />purpose of this section is to propose hypotheses and studies to evaluate these <br />possible effects. An important component will be to provide test flows from <br />the Aspinall Unit to facilitate the studies. Because the largest change <br />resulting from the construction and operation of Aspinall (and other Bureau <br />projects) has been to alter the flow regime, the test flows should more <br />closely mimic the natural hydrograph of the Gunnison River (i.e. higher spring <br />flows, and lower fall and winter flows). The unallocated water currently <br />stored in Blue Mesa Reservoir should be used to supply water for the study. <br />The evaluation of the effects of the Aspinall Unit will involve a series <br />of studies, conducted by different organizations, but closely coordinated by <br />the Fish and Wildlife Service and the Bureau of Reclamation. The evaluation <br />will involve five years; however, many of the individual studies can be <br />completed more quickly. The five-year time frame should be sufficient to <br />allow for unforseen problems that could delay completion of individual <br />studies. Also, it is likely that the proposed studies may identify additional <br />questions to be asked. Because of the. large variation in spring flows <br />requested, the ability to release the higher spring flows will be limited in <br />some years because of low snowpack or low storage. Because of this <br />uncertainty, we may not be able to predict more than a few months in advance <br />31 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.