My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7740
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7740
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:56 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 3:53:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7740
Author
McAda, C. W. and L. R. Kaeding.
Title
Physical Changes in the Gunnison and Colorado Rivers Resulting from Construction of the Aspinall Unit and Related Projects, with Hypotheses to Assess the Effects on the Endangered Fishes
USFW Year
1991.
USFW - Doc Type
Final Report.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Dam in 1936. Dam construction began in the upper Colorado River shortly after <br />that (i.e. Green Mountain Dam in 1942). The first dam of the Aspinall Unit <br />(Blue Mesa) closed in 1965. Therefore, to accommodate the changes in water <br />usage during the period of record, we divided the available streamflow data <br />into three periods: early development (1914-1936), middle development (1937- <br />1965), and post-Aspinall development (1966-1989). We compared post-Aspinall <br />streamflow with early- and middle-development streamflows to determine the <br />effect of the Aspinall Unit on streamflow in the Gunnison and Colorado rivers. <br />We also used synthesized data (HDR Engineering, Inc. 1989) to estimate <br />what Gunnison River flows would have been during the middle-development and <br />post-Aspinall periods without any water development in the basin. The <br />synthesized data were only available for 1952 through 1983, so we compared it <br />with actual streamflow for those years to estimate the effect of Aspinall on <br />Gunnison River flows. These estimates served to validate changes estimated <br />with the previously described method and to provide an estimate of the effect <br />of early irrigation diversions on streamflow. <br />EFFECT OF THE ASPINALL UNIT ON THE GUNNISON AND COLORADO RIVERS <br />Water Temperature <br />The synthesized water temperature data showed a large difference between <br />pre- and post-Aspinall temperatures at Crystal Dam. However, the water warmed <br />rapidly as it moved downstream--water temperatures differed by a maximum of 2 <br />°C at river mile 20 (Figure 2, Table A1). River mile 20 is midway through the <br />reach of Gunnison River currently inhabited by Colorado squawfish (Valdez et <br />al. 1982a). The observed difference was less at the mouth of the Gunnison <br />River (Figure 2). Water temperature in the Colorado River is essentially <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.