Laserfiche WebLink
Interaction Matrices for Resources and Actions <br />Tables 7, 8, and 9 are Resource/Action Matrices for the states of Colorado, <br />Utah and Wyoming, respectively. These matrices include all the Type One and <br />Type Two Resources and Type One and Energy Actions and sumarize, using <br />symbols, the potential, recognized, and perceived interactions among them. <br />For clarification, potential interaction is where there is geographical <br />overlap between a Resource and Action. Figures 6 through 11 display various <br />combinations of potential interactions. A recognized interaction is where <br />either a positive or negative interaction exists between a Resource and Action <br />and has been described on the COOT/CARE form. A perceived interaction indicates <br />that there is both geographical overlap between a Resource and an Action and <br />that a relationship has been described on the COOT/CARP form. Given these <br />definitions, the matrices serve to focus attention on the interactions of <br />greatest concern are the (perceived) variety, shown as black rectangles. <br />Resource Goals <br />Participants in the COOT and CARP workshops described a number of resource <br />goals for specific species and habitats of the Upper Basin. These goals <br />include preservation, restoration, stabilization, replacement and other. <br />0 <br />0 <br />-)? C.