Laserfiche WebLink
Institution's Division of Reptiles carried much of the burden of assembling the reptile and <br />amphibian sections. Dr. Robert R. Miller, Curator of Fishes, Museum of Zoology, Universit• <br />of Michigan, Dr. Edward C. Kinney, and Mr. Stephen H. Taub of the Division of Fishery <br />Services, Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife, were largely responsible for the section <br />on fishes. Howard R. Leach, Wildlife Management Branch, California Department of Fish <br />and Game, Sacramento, California, and others of that agency reviewed and constructively <br />commented on the data pages pertaining to California. Data were gleaned from the published <br />and unpublished work of many other scientists and agencies which are too numerous to be <br />acknowledged individually. <br />Federal Acts <br />Perhaps more confusion exists about the kind of protection an endangered species receives <br />than about any other aspect of the program . Neither the Endangered Species Protection Act <br />of 1966 (80 Stat. 926) nor its amended version, the Endangered Species Conservation Act of <br />1969, provides a Federal prohibition against the taking or possession of native endangered <br />fish and wildlife. Federal protection is afforded to migratory birds through the Migratory <br />Bird Treaty Act, as amended (16 U . S . C . 703-711); to eagles through. the Bald Eagle- Act, as <br />amended (16 U . S . C . 668-668d) : and to marine mammals through the Marine Mammal <br />Protection Act (F.L. 92-522) . Resident wildlife such as quail and pheasants, terrestrial <br />mammals, fishes, amphibians and reptiles may be under State jurisdiction but do not have <br />Federal protection except as provided on some Federal lands . Under the Lacey Act, as <br />amended (18 U . S . C . 42-44) the Federal Government can become involved if an animal <br />(endangered or not) is taken in violation of State law, and then moved across State or <br />international boundaries . <br />Formal involvement by the Federal Government in endangered species conservation began <br />with the Endangered Species Preservation Act of 1966. That law acknowledged a national <br />responsibility to act on behalf of native species of wildlife which were "threatened with <br />extinction." It required the Secretary of the Interior to judge what was endangered and <br />publish in the Federal Register lists of such animals by scientific and common name. He <br />then was authorized to: <br />1. Conduct research on such animals . <br />2. Use limited amounts of money {$750,000 per area, $2.5 million per year <br />for a total. of $15 million) from the Land and Water Conservation Fund to <br />acquire habitat for them . <br />The Endangered Species Conservation Act of 1969 was signed into law on December 5, 1969. <br />This amendment to the 1966 Act broadened the scope of the effort to conserve endangered <br />species . Among other things it: <br />Broadened the coverage of the Act to include all vertebrates , mollusks <br />and crustaceans . <br />2. Permitted the consideration of subspecies as well as species (a subspecies <br />is a recognizable race or variant within a species). <br />iv <br />