Laserfiche WebLink
0 <br />13 <br />decreased to 0 C in early January. Highest flows occurred in March when <br />maximun river temperatures rose to 1 C and ice break-up occurred (Appendix C, <br />preliminary USGS records provided by Bob Boulger, Meeker, Colorado). Weekly <br />average ice thickness recorded in habitats used by radiotagged squawfish for <br />the eight sampling trips ranged from 0.2 to 1.5 feet (Table 4). Ice was <br />present in habitats used by squawfish throughout the winter study except the <br />last scheduled trip March 16-21 when the entire river was ice free in the two <br />study areas. <br />Ice formation and habitat use <br /> Ice formation was noted on the Yampa River as early as November 11. <br /> Squawfish were observed by radiotelemetry to move under the ice at the large <br /> backwater at RMI 95.7 (Figure 4) and at the large embayment at RM1 81.1 <br /> (Figure 5) at this initial ice formation. On the first scheduled trip <br /> December 1-5, the main river channel was clogged with floating ice and slush <br /> during the early morning hours. Low velocity shoreline areas were frozen over. <br /> All nine squawfish located on that trip were in habitat areas that were iced <br /> over even though the main channel would clear of ice by late afternoon. The <br /> initial ice over pattern outlined and identified habitat types that were used <br /> by squawfish throughout the rest of the winter. Because the lower velocity <br /> waters were the first to freeze, the ice actually served as a velocity <br /> <br />3Njf_sh were apparently attracted to these frozen-over low <br />indicator. Sgu <br /> velocity areas fgr- the cover and security they provided. In addition,.large <br /> schools of Mj=Laus were observed through the thin clear ice near shore, so <br /> food may have been an additional attraction. <br />Micro-habitat measurements <br />Out of the 590.5 total observation hours, 399.0 hours had associated <br />depth velocity and substrate measurements which could used to develop habitat <br />use information for these variables. A fish had to utilize a map location for <br />a least 30 minutes for habitat measurements to be taken. Total observation <br />times for each fish ranged from 36.6 to 78 hours. This met our goal of 36 <br />hours total observation time for each fish. Observation hours with associated <br />habitat measurement for each fish ranged from 22.2 to 57.6 hours. <br />General habitat, use <br />During the? winter, four distinctive habitat types were frequented by <br />radiotagged fish. These habit s were eat identified because of the <br />pattern of initial ice formation occurring in these low velocity habitats-. <br />h'`r squawfish from Group A (A8, A10, and Ail) utilized a large backwater at <br />RMI 95.7 (Figure 4) almost exclusively throughout the winter (Table 3). This <br />large winter macro-habitat backwater (50x100 meters) was the only one of its <br />kind used during the winter study. Backwaters of this size are not common on <br />the upper Yampa, River during low flow periods. Of 590.5 total observation <br />hours on 10 radiotagged squawfish, 211 hours (36%) were from this backwater <br />(Table 5). Observation hours tended to accumulate in this habitat because <br />fishes A7, A10, and All used this habitat concurrently and observations were <br />made simultaneously on all squawfish present. These three fish were often very <br />close (<2 meter's) to each other. Most often they would be located near a large <br />0