My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7425
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7425
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:56 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 3:41:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7425
Author
Vandas, S. e. a.
Title
Dolores River Instream Flow Assessment
USFW Year
1990.
USFW - Doc Type
Project Report.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
126
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />The mid-channel bars growth toward the surface <br />tends to concentrate flow in the flanking channels, <br />which in turn causes scouring of the channel bed and! <br />or eroding of the channel banks. Bars, especially in <br />rivers with controlled flow regimes such as the <br />Dolores, tend to become stabilized with vegetation, <br />which prevents them from being easily eroded and <br />helps to trap fine materials during high flows. <br />Braided zones resulting from mid-channel bar <br />development usually have steeper channel gradients, <br />and are shallower and wider than unbraided river <br />reaches. <br />A tally of the prominent mid-channel bars in the <br />study area can be found in Table 10. The reach from <br />Bradfield Bridge to Dove Creek Pump Station has <br />approximately 0.50 bars per mile, with most of them <br />being closer to Bradfield Bridge. The bars in this <br />reach appear to be resulting from instabilities in the <br />channel banks, possibly from livestock grazing or <br />recreational use. Unstable or easily eroded channel <br />banks allow the channel to become wider and <br />shallower, promoting the establishment of bars. <br />Consequently, once the bars are formed, channel <br />bank erosion is accelerated. The reach from the <br />Disappointment Creek confluence to the WSA <br />boundary has the highest occurrence of mid-channel <br />bars at one per mile. As with the first reach dis- <br />cussed, the bars in this reach appear to have been <br />enhanced from human related activities. However, <br />this reach is the least confined section in the study <br />area, and it receives a large sediment load from <br />Disappointment Creek, both factors in mid-channel <br />bar development. The reach within the WSA has <br />0.44 bars per mile, Several of these bars occur <br />downstream from major tributaries (e.g., Spring <br />Canyon, La Sal Creek, etc.) that deposit large <br />sediment loads into the Dolores River. The confine- <br />ment of the river in this reach is partially responsible <br />for the low occurrence of mid-channel bars. <br />Tributary bars are formed where major side <br />canyons deposit their sediment loads when they meet <br /> <br />Table 10, Tally of Mid-Channel Bars <br /> <br />the Dolores River. Most of the rapids (Bull Canyon, <br />Spring Canyon, La Sal Creek, etc.), especially in the <br />lower part of the study area, are a result of these <br />depositional features. Commonly, these alluvial <br />deposits, extending out from the mouth of the side <br />canyons, push the main stem channel against the <br />opposite bank until it encounters bedrock. High <br />flows in the Dolores River determine channel width <br />and slope through these deposits (rapids). Reducing <br />the occurrence of high flows raises the possibility <br />that the rapids may increase in gradient and decrease <br />in width as tributary flooding adds new debris <br />(Howard and Dolan, 1981). <br />A river channel is considered meandering when <br />the sinuosity (channel length divided by straight-line <br />down-valley distance) exceeds 1.5 (Ruhe, 1975). <br />According to this definition the Dolores River for the <br />entire length of the study area is considered meander- <br />ing, with the exception of a few miles near Bradfield <br />Bridge. Even though some of the sinuosity may be <br />initiated and controlled by the local geologic struc- <br />ture, meandering channels expend large amounts of <br />energy due to the work required when water changes <br />its direction of flow. The meander sequence in <br />alluvial channels has been found to closely correlate <br />to the size and discharge of the river (personal <br />communication, Dr, L. Leopold, 1989). On the <br />average, one meander wavelength is equivalent in <br />length to 10-14 times the bank-full channel width. <br />The bank-full channel width in turn is predominantly <br />controlled by the bank-full discharge, as previously <br />discussed. <br />Pools are most commonly defmed as relatively <br />deep portions of the river channel experiencing <br />converging flow, while riffles are more shallow than <br />pools and occur in zones of diverging flow, In any <br />given river reach, energy loss is greater than the <br />average over riffles and less than the average in <br />pools. In a meandering river, riffles are typically <br />located between successive pools at the "crossover" <br />(or inflection) point of the thalweg (Beschta and <br /> <br />River Reach Number River Miles Number Per Mile <br />Bradfield Brdg. to Dove Cr. Pump Sta. g 18 0.50 <br />Dove Cr. Pump Sta. to Disappointment Cr. g 25 0.36 <br />Disappointment Cr. to WSA Boundary 22 22 1.00 <br />WSA Boundary to Bedrock 14 32 0.44 <br /> <br />28 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.