Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />DRAFT <br /> <br />APPmoIX F <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />PERFORMANCE OF RADIOTELEMETRY EXJUIPMEN1' <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The frequency and pulse rate of each radiotransmitter were checked by FWS prior <br />to transferring the tags to BIOjWEST. Also, the frequency and pulse rate were <br />checked by BIOjWEST prior to and immediately after implantation (Table 3). <br />Variation in frequency and/or pulse rate was detected in most of the <br />radiotransmitters with decreases in pulse rate occurring most commonly. <br />Generally, both the frequency and the pulse rates stabilized within about a <br />month after implantation, but some variation continued throughout the study and <br />may be attributed to fluctuating cold water temperatures. <br /> <br />Generally, the radio receivers provided by the FWS for this study performed <br />satisfactorily. There was some initial difficulty distinguishing transmitters <br />of very close frequencies and similar pulse rates. In one case, two of four <br />fish aggregated in one area had such transmitters. As the study progressed, <br />differences in transmissions from AVM and Smith-Root transmi tters, which <br />included differences in tone and duration of pulse, were more readily <br />recognized. This aided in identifying transmitters. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />52 <br /> <br />. <br />