Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />DRAFT <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The resulting ice mass was characterized by highly irregular upper and lower <br />surfaces caused by large pieces of ice being tilted then frozen into place by <br />water seeping through cracks and crevices. This condition was present for <br />only a short time during the 1986-87 winter, following a breakup of surface ice <br />in the Green River on January 28. At that time, jam ice formed across the <br />channel from RM 276.0 to the lower limit of the study area. This condition <br />persisted through mid February with the upper end of the jam being slowly <br />eroded by melting and current action. At some time during mid February, the <br />channel opened and all the jam ice was flushed down river, leaving only piles <br />of broken ice along the shoreline and sandbars. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />3. Frazil ice. During periods of extremely low temperatures, <br />supercooling of river water resulted in the formation of frazil ice. Depending <br />on the duration and severity of the low temperatures, the formation of frazil <br />ice ranged from only a few crystals floating in the water to a heavy slush <br />condition. The river often appeared milky and became more viscous from the <br />large amount of ice crystals present. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Varying degrees of frazil ice formation were observed in late December and <br />January of the 1986-87 winter. It was most commonly seen in the morning <br />following subzero nightime temperatures. Most frazil ice was melted by 1000 or <br />1100 hours as water temperatures were moderated by solar radiation. On January <br />15 heavy frazil ice formed from Jensen to the lower limit of the study area. <br />This coincided with the onset of very cold temperatures and the subsequent <br />formation of solid ice in the same area on January 16. Frazil ice is often the <br />precursor to solid ice. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />4.2 THE WINTER OF 1987-88 <br /> <br />4.2.1 River Flow <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Flow regimes during the second winter were generally lower and more variable <br />than the first (Figure 2). The variability in discharge observed during the <br />second winter of the study was related in part, to test flows delivered for two <br />fisheries studies being conducted throughout the winter below the dam; this <br />study as well as a second on the salmonid fishery below the tailrace. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />4.2.2 Air and Water Temperatue <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Significantly lower ambient temperatures (Table 2) and lower releases from <br />Flaming Gorge Dam resulted in much lower water temperatures during most of the <br />1987-88 winter. Monthly means, minimum, and maximum air temperatures during <br />January and February were 3.6 to 7.60 C below normal. This resulted in <br />frequent supercooled conditions causing extensive frazil ice formation in the <br />upper region of the study area. Consistent ice cover from RM 316 to the lower <br />end of the study area served to moderate water temperatures in the lower region <br />so that the water flowing under the ice remained at zero degrees celcius until <br />spring break-up. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />17 <br /> <br />. <br />