My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7416
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7416
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:56 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 3:35:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7416
Author
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Title
Flaming Gorge Aspinall Joint Operations Study December, 15, 1988-Draft.
USFW Year
1988.
USFW - Doc Type
Denver, Colorado.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
There may be ways to reduce these potential economic impacts. <br />For example, Western may be able to replace the lost 2-plus <br />months of capacity by: <br />(1) exchanging power through intertie arrangements with <br />another producer with a different peak season, <br />(2) purchasing power from another producer, or <br />(3) generating capacity temporarily using a gas turbine. By <br />combining the 2-plus months of capacity provided through <br />these means with the months of unaffected summer capacity, <br />Western could continue to market a 6-month block <br />maintaining 47 MW of firm power. <br />Flexibility of Power Operations <br />Western has suggested that electrical generation impacts could be <br />reduced by allowing some operational flexibility at Flaming Gorge <br />during the period of constrained releases. The effects on firm <br />power could be reduced significantly if releases of up to 4,200 <br />cfs could be permitted for periods of short duration (1-3 hours) <br />to address spinning reserve needs, generate against inadvertent <br />flow (unscheduled energy on a transmission line), reduce <br />emergency transmission line overload on the system, or meet peak <br />demand when demand is especially high. This would allow Western <br />to maintain it's marketable resources and eliminate need for <br />replacement power, valued at $5.8 million annually. If this <br />concept could be implemented, the only remaining impacts to <br />Western, it's customer utilities and consumers would be those <br />arising from rescheduled generation valued as a $298,189 annual <br />economic loss at Flaming Gorge, and offset by a $47,000 annual <br />economic gain at Aspinall over the long term). This would result <br />in an estimated increase in retail rates of less than 0.2 <br />percent. <br />G. OBSERVATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS <br />From the discussion above, several conclusions can be drawn. The <br />Bureau's position is that there is considerable flexibility in <br />operating Flaming Gorge and the Aspinall Units. The controlled <br />releases proposed by the Service are easily within the operating <br />capability of the reservoirs under normal operating conditions. <br />The rescheduling of releases at Flaming Gorge causes a minor <br />adjustment in release schedules, but average annual compact <br />requirements are not altered. This conclusion is born out by a <br />recent Solicitor,s opinion requested by the Bureau (attached). <br />The opinion states "we are of the opinion that the Secretary of <br />Interior may change the operation of the dam, provided there are <br />well supported reasons, such as resource considerations, which <br />require the change." <br />8
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.