My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7415
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7415
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:56 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 3:35:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7415
Author
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Title
Flaming Gorge Peaking Power Study-Preliminary Draft.
USFW Year
1988.
USFW - Doc Type
Denver, Colorado.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
We initially attempted to calibrate the entire new portion of the <br />network, but found that our computed flows at Tia Juana Bottom <br />were not matching our recorded flows. From reviewing the flow <br />data of the Duchesne and White, it was determined that the major <br />peaks in flow at Tia Juana Bottom were attributed to the Duchesne <br />and White Rivers and not from flow released at Flaming Gorge. <br />Therefore, we decided to calibrate the total network in four <br />phases as follows: <br />1. Green River from Flaming Gorge to Tia Juana Bottom <br />excluding the flow of the White and Duchesne Rivers. <br />2. Flow of the Duchesne River only from the Duchesne <br />recording station to Tia Juana Bottom. <br />3. Flow of the White River only from the White River <br />recording station to Tia Juana Bottom. <br />4. Composite of 1, 2, and 3. <br />Using this approach, we were able to isolate reaches where <br />calibration was poor and concentrate on each of these reaches <br />individually. The method proved successful and we were able to <br />identify travel time problems associated with the Duchesne and <br />White Rivers. <br />After solving the travel time problem, the traces seemed to match <br />well at every point except where there was a major storm event on <br />the Duchesne or White Rivers. We finally came to the conclusion <br />that the major differences between the computed and recorded flow <br />at Tia Juana Bottom could be attributed to other sources, such as <br />localized rain storms which occurred between the gage and the <br />confluence of the Green River. <br />Disregarding the short term effects of local flows in the area <br />upstream of Tia Juana Bottom, the SSARR model as presently <br />calibrated does accurately reflect changes in flows from Flaming <br />Gorge Reservoir. Calibration of each node can be considered good <br />down to the Jensen gage. Calibration downstream of Jensen should <br />be considered as fair and does display some cumulative error which <br />effects the calibration for nodes downstream of Jensen. This <br />error is not significant and effects the timing of peaks more than <br />their magnitude. <br />VI. CALIBRATION RESULTS <br />Tables 4-5 and figures 6-8 display results for each of the sites <br />that are currently calibrated based upon differing releases from <br />Flaming Gorge. Printouts of calibration results are included in <br />Appendix B. <br />15
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.