Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Al TERNATIVE <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />NPS <br /> <br />NPS <br /> <br />3 <br />BlM <br /> <br />OPTION A <br />(GGSRMA) <br /> <br />OPTION B <br />(GGNCA) <br /> <br />DESCRIPTION OF ALTERNATIVE <br /> <br />Provides for expan :ling the boundary of BlCA. The <br />expansion would primarily include the Lower Gunnison Gorge <br />situated between the west boundary of BlCA, and the <br />confluen~ of the Gunnison and North Fork Rivers. <br />Boundaries are defined by land lines. This expansion would <br />increase the monument acreage to 45,936. Refer to *2 and <br />*3. <br /> <br />Provides for expanding the boundary of BlCA. The <br />expansion would primarily include the Lower Gunnison Gorge <br />situated between the confluen~ of the Gunnison and North <br />Fork Rivers. Boundaries are defined by a combination of <br />land lines and natural topographic features. This expansion <br />would increase the monument acreage to 45,056. Refer to <br />*2 and *3. <br /> <br />Option A. This alternative takes in the same geographic area <br />as the Gunnison Gorge Recreation Area. Under this alternative <br />the area would be designated as the Gunnison Gorge Special <br />Recreation Management Area (GGSRMA), which is the same <br />as existing management. The land being considered under <br />this option also includes the 22,Q78-acre area recommended <br />for wilderness. <br /> <br />Option B. Same as above with the exception that the area <br />will be designated as the Gunnison Gorge National <br />Conservation Area. <br /> <br />APPENDIX B <br /> <br />AL TERNA TIVES MATRIX <br /> <br />ACREAGE AFFECTED <br /> <br />MANAGEMENT DIFFERENCES <br /> <br />BlM <br /> <br />PRIVATE <br /> <br />OTHER <br /> <br />AIR QUALITY <br /> <br />VISUAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT <br /> <br />24,543 <br /> <br />627 <br /> <br />Federal classification (Class II) would remain unchanged, <br />unless redesignated Class I by State action. No change in <br />allowable increment; no threat to economic development or <br />to industries using best available controls. <br /> <br />Management emphasis on maintaining natural scene. Within <br />designated or potential wilderness areas, the preservation of <br />wilderness character and resources is the primary <br />management responsibility. Should Congress decide not to <br />designate wilderness, YAM would be based on the concept <br />of preservation. <br /> <br />N/A <br /> <br />23,505 <br /> <br />785 <br /> <br />N/A <br /> <br />Same as Alternative 1. <br /> <br />Same as Alternative 1. <br /> <br />61,830 <br /> <br />2,309 <br /> <br />Visual resource class ranges from Oass I to V with Class I <br />affording the most protection for scenery. The majority of <br />the Gunnison Gorge is within a YAM Class II fiith <br />management objectives to design projects with a low visual <br />contrast. Area open to OR\! use managed as YAM Class IV. <br />The Smith Fork and Red Canyon areas are Class III <br />designation. <br /> <br />N/A <br /> <br />Same as Alternative 1. <br /> <br />61,830 <br /> <br />2,309 <br /> <br />Same as Alternative 1 <br /> <br />Same as Alternative 3, Option A. <br /> <br />N/A <br /> <br />*1. The missions of the NPS & BlM are different and represent an important and necessary concept in the management of our <br />nations resources. In reviewing each altemative, one must keep in mind that such differences often result in considerably different <br />maf'agement guidelines. For reference purposes, the missions are as follows; <br /> <br />*2 A change in status to National Park would not affect management. This is also basically true for NPS lands designated as <br />wilderness. Any uses that could affect wilderness potential are identified under 'MANAGEMENT DIFFERENCES' column. This <br />column also identifies management requirements that may impact use of the area if designated as wilderness. <br /> <br />NPS MISSION <br /> <br />Conserve the scenery and the natural and historic objects <br />and the wild life therein and to provide for the enjoyment of <br />the same in such manner and by such means as will leave <br />them unimpaired for the enjoyment of future generations. <br />(Organic Act 1916) <br /> <br />BlM MISSION <br /> <br />'3. It is assumed that all BlM lands outside the boundaries of this alternative will continue to be managed 111 accordance With BLMs <br />current Resource Management Plan. <br /> <br />Provide for the protection (including fire suppression), orderly <br />development, and use of the publiC lands and resources <br />under principles of multiple use and sustained yield. (FlPMA <br />1976, Government Manual.) <br />