Laserfiche WebLink
17 <br /> <br />' LIST OF TABLES <br /> Page No. <br /> Table 1. REGULATION STRATEGY AND 1986 BIOMASS ESTIMATES FOR SOUTH 15 <br /> PLATTE RIVER FROM CHEESMAN RESERVOIR TO STRONTIA SPRINGS <br /> RESERVOIR <br /> <br /> Table 2. QUALITY OF TROUT POPULATIONS (TROUT PER HECTARE OVER 16 <br /> 14 INCHES) IN COLORADO STREAMS IN 1985 (Nehring, 1986) <br /> Table 3. SOUTH PLATTE RIVER INUNDATION IMPACTS. EFFECTIVE 39 <br /> HABITAT IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED TWO FORKS RESERVOIR <br /> PROJECT AS SQUARE FEET OF WEIGHTED USEABLE AREA <br /> Table 4. SOUTH PLATTE RIVER FLOW MODIFICATION IMPACTS. EFFECTIVE 39 <br /> HABITAT IMPACTS OF THE TWO FORKS RESERVOIR PROJECT <br />' EXPRESSED AS SQUARE FEET OF WEIGHTED USEABLE AREA <br /> Table 5. BLUE RIVER FLOW MODIFICATION IMPACTS. EFFECTIVE HABITAT 40, <br /> IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED TWO FORKS RESERVOIR PROJECT <br />' -EXPRESSED AS SQUARE FEET OF WEIGHTED USEABLE AREA <br /> Table 6. NORTH FORK OF SOUTH PLATTE RIVER FLOW MODIFICATION <br />IMPACTS. EFFECTIVE HABITAT IMPACTS OF THE TWO FORKS 41 <br /> RESERVOIR PROJECT EXPRESSED AS SQUARE FEET OF WEIGHTED <br /> USEABLE AREA <br />' <br /> Table 7. SOUTH BOULDER CREEK FLOW MODIFICATION IMPACTS 41 <br /> EFFECTIVE HABITAT IMPACTS OF THE TWO FORKS <br /> RESERVOIR PROJECT EXPRESSED AS SQUARE FEET OF <br />' WEIGHTED USEABLE AREA <br />Table 8. WILLIAMS FORK RIVER FLOW MODIFICATION IMPACTS. EFFECTIVE 42 <br />' HABITAT IMPACTS OF THE TWO FORKS RESERVOIR PROJECT <br />EXPRESSED AS SQUARE FEET OF WEIGHTED USEABLE AREA <br />' Table 9. FRASER RIVER FLOW MODIFICATION IMPACTS. EFFECTIVE 43 <br />- IMPACTS OF THE TWO FORKS RESERVOIR PROJECT EXPRESSED <br />AS SQUARE FEET OF WEIGHTED USEABLE AREA <br />' Table 10. WILDLIFE.SPECIES POTENTIALLY FOUND BY VEGETATION TYPE 49 <br />IN THE TWO FORKS ANALYSIS AREA <br />1 <br />