Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />i <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br /> Page No. <br />II. C. 3. a. Colorado 38 <br />II. C. 3. b. Nebraska 44 <br />II. D. Terrestrial Resources 45 <br />II. D. 1. Terrestrial Evaluation Methodology 45 <br />II. D. 1. a. Colorado 45 <br />II. D. 1. b. Nebraska 47 <br />II. D. 2. Terrestrial Resources Without Project 48 <br />II. D. 2. a. Colorado 48 <br />II. D. 2. a. (1) Two-Forks Study Area 48 <br />II. D. 2. a. (2) Blue River, Williams Fork River, Fraser River, <br /> Vasquez Creek and South Boulder Creek 55 <br />II. D.. 2. b. Nebraska 55 <br />II. D. 3. Terrestrial Resources With Project 62 <br />II. D. 3. a. Colorado 62 <br />II. D. 3. b. Nebraska 65 <br />II. E. Cumulative Impacts 66 <br />II. F. Mitigation 68 <br />II. F. 1. Mitigation Team 70 <br />II. F. 2. Administrative Recommendations 71 <br />II. F. 3. Aquatic Mitigation 72 <br />II. F. 3. a. Instream Habitat Mitigation 74 <br />II. F. 3. b. Stream and Reservoir Fishery Management 78 <br />II. F. 3. c. Macroinvertebrates 79