Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />.' <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />~TIOOS <br /> <br />1. Continued monitoring of adult Colorado squawfisn and razorback suckers is <br />recommended for winter 1987-88, to gather additional habitat information. <br /> <br />2. <br /> <br />. <br />The same 2-hour monitoring program with associated measurements is <br />recommended for winter 1987-88. <br /> <br />3. <br /> <br />The 24-hour monitoring program should be changed to a system of <br />randomization by time of day or night, whereby the start time for <br />monitoring a designated fish is selected at random. The monitoring period <br />would be for 2-hours instead of 24-hours. The 24-hgyr monitoring is very <br />labor-intensive, and the results indicate that, during the winter, a ~ <br />fu2.y.r monitoring period represents fish u~e d2ring the remainder .E-f the <br /> <br />~. ~"ft ~o( 't'C..~<\..t.'f- ''''t.~jo..'''.l ~ ~t wodc. 1+ wt \00" ..:;:- ,^..1,..+..~ ,etf. <br /> <br />Based on observed movements of fish with significant changes in water <br />level, it is recommended that at least one flow experiment be conducted <br />using Flamdng Gorge Dam to fluctuate wateir levels at a predetermined time <br />when observers are with an aggregation of fish. The -purpose of this <br />experiment is to establish minimum tolerable depths and velocities, as <br />indicated !:?Y ~ chanqing posi tion ~ a deeper ~eqion of the river. <br />- <br /> <br />4. <br /> <br />5. <br /> <br />Establishment of staff gauges at key locations, such as Echo Park, Split <br />Mountain, Ashley Creek, Bonanza Bridge, and Ouray is recommended to <br />monitor water levels during monitoringpriods. ~:z.~ ':l-N,^" '1"'6",,-\0,.'): <br />~o( ""t.-...lr- (J"'''PHt.? 'TI'l. ~ <l.. r<4"O~. <br />More time should be spent developing detailed maps of areas used by fish, <br />possibly developin~ depth contours of areas consistently frequented. <br />~~O( tJ '-+ &lJo.~tm,. <br />Continued use of Smith-Root SR-40 and RF-40 receivers and associated <br />antennas is recommended for consistency through the study. <br /> <br />6. <br /> <br />7. <br /> <br />8. Continued use of Smith-Root radiotransmitters is recommended; the use of <br />AVM radiotransmitters should be discontinued because: <br /> <br />a. AVM transmitters are larger diameter and shape than Smith-Root <br />transmitters, and require a larger incision in the fish. <br /> <br />b. Greater variation in frequency and pulse rate were observed in <br />the AVM transmitters than in Smith-Root modules. <br /> <br />c. <br /> <br />Reduced signal strength was noted in AVM transmitters that <br />caused problems in locating fish by air and ground. <br /> <br />9. <br /> <br />Considering that. the available radio frequencies range from 40.660 to <br />40.700 MHz, ~plan to order 20 radiotransmitters with the fOIIOWinj~OfAt <br />frequencies: ~. 660, 1Q ~ 662, 40.664, 40.666, 40.668, 40.670, 40.672, ~." ~~.... <br />40.674, 40.676, 40.67'8l-~.680, 40.682, 40.684, 40.686, 40.688, 40.690, \f"t '" <br />40.692, 40.694, 40.69~ and 40.698. Pulse rates will be requested as 40, <br />60, 80 ppm for the adjacent frequencies. <br /> <br />34 <br />