Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Local Movement. Local movement describes activity of the fish within a <br />localized area, with no significant change in position, up or downriver. This <br />pattern often involved movement between two to four 'preferred sites' (where <br />the fish spent most of its time) within a localized area or habitat such as an <br />eddy or backwater. ~cal movement was mo~y ggnfined to an area of 9-400 <br />s,gyare meters, and was observed during either 2-hour or 24-hour mpnitoring. <br />Local movement patterns were most ~n w~th Colorado squawfish, and may be <br />associated with feeding behavior. All movements were estimated in linear <br />distance (meters) either up or downstream and in or out from shore, relative to <br />the point of first contact during that monitoring period. <br /> <br />The fish that were observed in this local movement pattern during <br />moni to ring were located by triangulation as often as possible. It was noted <br />that generally the fish spent most of their time in specific sites to which <br />they often returned during the local movement. As described earlier, habitat <br />measurements were recorded only if the fish was observed stationary for at <br />least 15 minutes. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Long-Range Movement. Long-range movement was associated with a fish that <br />changed position in the river significantly. This movement was considered <br />transitory, between habitats located some distance apart. Although long-range <br />movement was generally documented as occurring between radiotracking trips, <br />this movement pattern was also observed during the 2-hour and 24-hour <br />monitoring. On two occasions, once while monitoring a razorback and once while <br />monitoring a squawfish, the fish were contacted during relatively long-range or <br />transi tory movements. In both cases, the fish were located later in the day <br />0.1 to 0.2 miles downstream. When relocated, the razorback sucker had assumed <br />a no-movement pattern in a slow run and the squawfish a localized movement <br />pattern in a small backwater. During 24-hour monitoring, either species would <br />often exhibit all three types of movement patterns. Movement by razorback <br />suckers during the 24-hour period ranged from absolutely no movement to <br />movements of up to 125 meters from the point where initially contacted. <br />Movements made by Colorado squawfish ranged from short local movements within a <br />discrete area to long range transitory movement of up to 0.5 miles. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The long range movement exhibi ted by adult Colorado squawfish and <br />razorback suckers during this winter investigation were examined. The site of <br />capture, release and relocation of each radiotagged fish are presented in Table <br />4. Net and total movement figures do not include the distance from the release <br />site to the location of first radio contact. It appears that ~of the ~sh <br />~ substantial movemen~s ~ the ~oint of release beforE settling down into <br />a localized area. For example, one razorback sucker (Carlin tag #3266) moved <br />31.6 miles downstream from the release site and remained in the same location <br />for the remainder of the study. The mean distance moved by Colorado squawfish <br />between the release site and the location of first radio contact was 6.2 miles <br />with a range of 0.1 to 16.6 miles; for razorback suckers, 7.2 miles with a <br />range of 0.1 to 31.6 miles. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />17 <br /> <br />. <br />