My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7381
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7381
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:56 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 3:31:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7381
Author
Valdez, R. A. and W. J. Masslich.
Title
Winter Habitat Study of Endangered Fish - Green River Annual Summary Report - 1986-87.
USFW Year
1987.
USFW - Doc Type
Logan, Utah.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Radiotracking <br /> <br />Six scheduled 10-day radiotracking trips were conducted during this <br />investigation (Table 2). An additional preliminary tracking trip of 7 days was <br />conducted to m~e;' with FWS and BOR personnel to standardize radiotracking <br />techniques, ~abitat measurements, and to organize and test equi~nt. The <br />six lO-day trips were conducted from December 12, 1986, through March 31, 1987. <br />Each radiotracking trip involved the use of a fixed-wing aircraft and boats. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Aerial telemetry. Aerial radiotracking was conducted in conjunction with <br />all seven tracking trips. A Cessna 182 RG fixed-wing aircraft equipped with <br />two omnidirectional whip antennas, an RF-40 receiver, and a SR-40 receiver was <br />used for all aerial radiotracking. One antenna was attached to each wing <br />strut, with the RF-40 antenna on the left side and the SR-40 antenna on the <br />right side. Antenna leads were connected directly to the receivers while <br />headphone leads (to the pilot and passenger) were routed through a switch box <br />that allowed the person monitoring the radios to quickly switch back and forth <br />between the audio from each receiver. Typically, a signal was received on the <br />search receiver (SR-40), and the observer would set the frequency on the RF-40 <br />receiver to the frequency of the fish most likely to be in the area. By <br />switching back and forth between receivers, and setting the RF-40 to the most <br />probable frequencies, the identity of a fish could generally be deter.mined with <br />one or two aerial passes. Locations provided through aerial telemetry were <br />generally w..i.1h.!n 0.1 mile ~ the :eoint subsequently located by boat. <br />Generally, aerial telemetry was conducted at ground speeds of 70-160 mph at <br />above-ground elevations of 50-1000 feet. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Ground telemetry. Aerial locations of the radiotagged fish were then <br />given to ground crews. Radiotracking from the ground was done from jonboats <br />and occasionally, from automobiles. The usual procedure involved motoring to <br />the location of a radiotagged fish from the nearest possible launch site. The <br />SR-40 receiver was used in the initial search for the signal. To obtain <br />maximum reception, the omnidirectional whip antenna, mounted to a metal plate 8 <br />feet above the water level was used. The receiver was continuously monitored <br />through headphones while in transit on the river. Once a radio signal was <br />received, the RF-40 receiver and a loop antenna were used to locate the fish in <br />the river channel. At this point the boat was taken to the nearest shore or <br />island, with care being taken not to disturb the fish. From land, the RF-40 <br />receiver was used exclusively; first to identify the fish bydetennining the <br />frequency and pulse emitted by the radiotransmi tter, and then to locate the <br />fish using triangulation. Triangulating the location of a fish involved using <br />the directional capabilities of the loop antenna (null and strongest signal) to <br />set up two or three bearings at different places along the shore. Bearing or <br />sightings were marked with two flagged metal rods put into the ground 10 to 15 <br />feet apart in line with the direction of the null and/or strongest signal. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.