Laserfiche WebLink
L <br />trout throughout the project period have been unacceptable. Returns by weight <br />have ranged from 72.4 percent in 1978 to 39.7 percent in 1980. Catch rates for <br />trout have not exceed 0.5 fish per hour since 1974. Since that time, catch <br />rates have declined steadily and only during 1981 did catch rates show any <br />increase over the previous years. <br />If all strains fail to meet the guidelines of the evaluation, it may be that <br />kokanee salmon will dominate the small trout harvest category. Kokanee are <br />very efficient plankton feeders and may be able to out compete or at least co- <br />exist with the Utah chub and white sucker for available plankton. The harvest <br />of kokanee has been increasingly dramatically since 1978, when only 27 kokanee <br />were harvested. <br />During 1981, the kokanee harvest was 2,148 fish. Average lengths and <br />weights of kokanee have been considerably larger (Table 26) than for rainbow <br />trout. A dramatic increase in the population of kokanee could cause a decline <br />in the average length and weight of kokanee. This may be a benefit to the <br />fishery as a whole, because kokanee would then be available as a forage fish for <br />more than the first two years of their life cycle in Flaming Gorge. <br />Flaming Gorge Reservoir has developed into a very important trophy fishery <br />for brown and lake trout. Brown trout were the second most abundant fish in the <br />harvest until 1979 when they were exceeded by lake trout (Figure 7). <br />Brown trout were first introduced into Flaming Gorge in 1966 (Table 2) to <br />make use of a rapidly expanding Utah chub population. The browns grew <br />exceedingly well and a world renowned brown trout fishery developed. Brown <br />trout larger than 20 pounds were not uncommon, in fact, the North American <br />brown trout record weighing 33 pounds 10 ounces and measuring 40 inches was <br />caught in 1977. Coincidentally, 1977 was also the year the trophy brown trout <br />fishery peaked (Figure 7). Since 1979, average lengths and weights have <br />steadily decreased. An attempt to revive the brown trout fishery was started in <br />1980, when the first of 3 years of increased brown trout plants was made. The <br />harvest of brown trout increased in 1982 to the levels seen during 1979 (Figure <br />7), although average length and weight were quite low (Table 26). Returns to <br />the creel have also been low (Table 20). However, returns to the creel by <br />weight have been more encouraging (Table 21), with a 52 percent by weight return <br />during 1982. Evaluation of the returns of fall planted advanced fingerlings (5 <br />inches) versus spring planted catchable-size (8 inches) browns should be <br />completed by 1988, the year of the next intensive creel survey. A final deci- <br />sion can then be made as to which planting procedure produces the best results. <br />The basis for continuing brown trout stocking will be the ability to produce a <br />return rate of at least 1.5 pounds to the fisherman's creel for each pound of <br />brown trout planted. During the interim period, every other year plants of <br />catchable brown trout will be made, based upon the preliminary results from the <br />1982 creel survey. <br />The brown trout planted during 1980, 1981, and 1983 will be faced with dif- <br />ferent environmental, plankton and forage factors than did the first plants of <br />brown trout in the reservoir. Brown trout grew well in the late 1960's and <br />early 1970's because abundant plankton produced rapid growth to a size which <br />allowed foraging on a rapidly expanding Utah chub population. There were no <br />other large populations of predators in the lake, so the brown trout assumed the <br />71 <br />-48- k