My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7369
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7369
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:56 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 3:27:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7369
Author
Marsh, P. C. and W. L. Minckley.
Title
Radiotagging Razorback Suckers
USFW Year
1989.
USFW - Doc Type
Gila River, Arizona 1988-1989.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
~. <br />RADIOTAG~I~1G RA20RBACK SUCKERS:- GILA RIVER, ARIZONA 1988-1989 <br />Paul C. Marsh and =~. L. Minckley <br />Center ~^r Environmental Studies and Department'of Zooiogy <br />Ar~-ona State University Temae Arizona X5287 <br />13 June 1989 <br />Four wild, adu:t razorback suckers trammel netted 20-23 May 1988-from <br />Lake Mohave. Arizona-Nevada, plus 10, 4-, 6-, or 7-year old, hatchery- <br />prooagated (Wexler NFH, New Mexico) F1 fish (Appendix 1) received <br />surgically-implanted, internal. radio tags on 24 May 1988. Fish were <br />released after surgery-into the Gila. River at the Old Safford Bridge, <br />Gr=enlee Co., Arizona, and .tracking began immediately thereafter. <br />All fish were located within 0.8 km of the release site during the 12 hr <br />following stocking. As of mid-July 1989 C32 d after release), two fish <br />with functional transmitters remained alive. eight others died and their <br />transmitters were recovered, contact was lost with two fish Cno contact <br />after i2 hr), and two fish died and/or released their transmitters, but <br />these last two were not retreived. No contacts with these fish were <br />established during later exercises (below). <br />Three of the original 14 fish moved upstream an average of 7.2 km trange <br />0.1 to 23.7 km): these remained at large an average of 10 d (range 1 to <br />32 d). Eleven fish moved downstream an average of 11.9 km (range 1.6 to <br />32.0 km) and contact was maintained for 19 d (range 4 to 32). Stream <br />channels occupied by fish (Table 1) averaged 10 + 5 (SD) m wide, 0.4 ± <br />0.3 m deep, and 0.21 ± 0.17 m/sec current velocity (n = 30). There was <br />significant differences habitats of fish moving up- versus downstream. <br />Individual tracking histories are In Appendix 1. <br />Radio-trackl`ng was further conducted by truck along.128 km of mayor <br />water-delivery canals and drains in the Safford Valley, and throughout <br />the Glla River reach from San Jose diversion dam .downstream to the delta <br />at San Carlos Reservoir. .Confidence was high that radio-implanted fish <br />would be detected because depths are relatively shallow (rarely <br />exceeding 0.5-0.28 m), and equipment was deployed either directly on or <br />In close proximity to the water. However, no contacts were established. <br />Because of high, short-term mortality of fish in May 1988. surgery was <br />performed on a second group of nine, 4-year old hatchery-produced fish <br />under controlled conditions at Dexter NFH. .After radio-implantation on <br />30 August 1988, fish were placed into an outdoor pond to recover-from <br />traumas associated with handling and surgery. One fish died the <br />following day, and a second a month later: recovered transmitters were <br />successfully implanted by Dexter personnel into healthy fish. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.