My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7367
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7367
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:56 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 3:27:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7367
Author
Nathanson, M. N.
Title
Updating the Hoover Dam Documents.
USFW Year
1978.
USFW - Doc Type
Denver, Colorado.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />CHAPTER I <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />In 1918. under a contract with the Imperial Irrigation District, the All-American Canal Board, chaired by <br />Dr. Meade. recommended legislation which would authorize a high dam for the storage of Colorado River <br />water and an All-American Canal to Imperial Valley. <br />This led to the Kincaid Act in 1920 (41 Stat. 600) which authorized the Secretary of the Interior to make a <br />study of the diversion and use of Colorado River waters. This resulted in the Fall-Davis Report in 1922, en- <br />titled "Problems of Imperial Valley and Vicinity" (Senate Document No. 142, 67th Congress, Second Ses- <br />sion). The report recommended the All-American Canal and a storage dam in the Lower Basin, rather than <br />in the Upper Basin, as the best possible site for flood control, storage, and a power development nearest to <br />the markets for power in southern California. Its data were also used by the negotiators of the Colorado River <br />Compact. The Fall-Davis Report stated that the Colordo River problems"... are of such magnitude as to be <br />beyond the reach of other than a national solution." And, finally, in 1924, the Weymouth Report spelled out <br />the details of what soon became the Boulder Canyon Project. <br /> <br />B. Colorado River Compact <br /> <br />B.l Background <br /> <br />The rapidly expanding use of Colorado River water in California was viewed with increasing alarm by of- <br />ficials in the Upper Basin States. As a consequence of their concern, the League of the Southwest was <br />organized in 1919 to promote the orderly development and equitable division of the waters of the Colorado <br />River. Congress approved the Kincaid Act in 1920 (41 Stat. 600) directing the Secretary qf the Interior to <br />make a full and comprehensive study and to report on the possible diversion and use of waters of the Colo- <br />rado River. <br />During the period when the studies by the Secretary were being conducted, negotiations were underway <br />by the seven Basin States for an inter-State agreement on the waters of the river which led to the Colorado <br />River Compact. While it was recognized that storage on the river was essential, the Upper Basin States faced <br />the possibility that water conserved by storage would be put to use in the Lower Basin more rapidly than the <br />Upper Basin could utilize its share of the normal flow and thus form the basis for Lower Basin claims of appro- <br />priative rights in the water. Hence, the Upper Basin insisted that rights to some of the Colorado River flows be <br />reserved for their future benefit. This could be done by a suit in the Supreme Court for equitable apportion- <br />ment or by agreement of the parties, although the latter had never been used to allocate waters of an inter- <br />State stream. <br /> <br />B.2 Negotiations <br /> <br />As a result of negotiations among the seven Basin States, it was agreed that an inter-State compact would <br />establish an equitable apportionment of the waters and protect the Upper Basin States. Each of the seven <br />Basin States adopted the authorizing legislation in 1921 and Congress consented to the negotiations by legis- <br />lation enacted on August 19, 1921 (42 Stat. 171). The Colorado River Compact Commission convened in <br />January 1922. Herbert Hoover, then Secretary of Commerce, was elected chairman. <br />The Upper Basin's fears and the wisdom of the decision to attempt an inter-State agreement was <br />demonstrated when the Supreme Court of the United States on June 5, 1922, in Wyoming v. Colorado, 259 <br />U.S. 419, upheld the doctrine of priority of appropriations regardless of State lines. <br /> <br />'~ <br />'i; <br />, <br />~ <br />; <br /> <br />B.3 Major Compact Provisions <br /> <br />\ <br />ff <br />,. <br /> <br />After 27 meetings, a final agreement on the Compact was signed in Santa Fe, New Mexico, on November <br />24, 1922. Although the States had hoped to allocate the Colorado River waters among each of the seven' <br />Basin States, such agreement was not possible. However, the Colorado River Compact did negotiate a <br />historic document. It had the following major provisions: <br />(1) Article I states the purposes of the Compact. <br />(2) Article II(a) defines the "Colorado River System" as "that portion of the Colorado River and its <br />tributaries within the United States of America." <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.