Laserfiche WebLink
<br />already tenuous hold on survival, its possible loss will have little impact <br />on the successfully reproducing Green and Colorado River squawfish <br />populations an-d therefore on the species itself." The opinion also concluded <br />-thai-consfruction of the Animas-LaPlata Project would further change the San <br /> <br />Juan River to a point where the Colorado squawfish population in the river <br /> <br />would likely be lost. <br />The Animas-LaPlatla biological opinion also recommended that USBR <br />conduct a thorough survey of the native fishes in the San Juan River. These <br />studies were initiated by the States of Utah and New Mexico in 1987 under <br /> <br />~ - <br />contract with USBR. Some salient findings of these studies (Platania and <br />Young 1990) are: <br /> <br />1. Colorado squawfish were collected from the San Juan River at <br />several locations --- Shiprock, New Mexico and Lake Powell, Utah. <br />2. Successful reproduction of Colorado squawfish was confirmed in 1987 <br />and 1988 by the capture of 18 young-of-year fish. <br />3. Suitable Colorado squawfish habitat appeared present throughout the <br /> <br />San Juan River and this species appeared to occupy the river on a <br />year-round basis. <br /> <br />As a result of these findings, USBR reinitiated Section 7 consultation <br />on the Animas-LaPlata Project in ,early 1990. Based on the results of the San <br />Juan River fishery surveys and the belief that Colorado squawfish populations <br /> <br />were not stable or showing signs of decline in other parts of the upper <br />basin, the USFWS issued a draft biological opinion in May 1990 that concluded <br />that the Animas-LaPlata Project was likely to jeopardize the continued <br />existence of Colorado squawfish. Furthermore, the USFWS concluded that no <br />reasonable or prudent alternatives were available to avoid jeopardy to the <br />squawfish and recommended additional fisheries studies be made to develop a <br />